Re: [Discuss] Move log4cxx to "attic"

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2012-06-12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:

> Why would you want to hold it in a dormant state rather than move it
> directly to the Attic?  If people show up who want to contribute,
> reviving it from the Attic shouldn't be more difficult than changing its
> state from dormant to active.
>
> I'd not be against marking it as dormant if you feel Attic was going too
> far.

Good point. I was not aware the Attic would eat subcomponents of
projects too rather than "complete projects". I am also fine with the
attic. And it does make sense instead inventing another graveyard.

>
> Stefan



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de