Re: Metuxmpm test failed
"Dmitry P. Schegolev" <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:29:18 +0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.metuxmpm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
- [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > separate program, not apache program, which only get data from tcp socket > > and multiplex it to ordinary apache process rely on http header. > > too slow, too resource intensive. Why? What difference? Now separate apache program do the same. It's called multiplexer. As I understood, It now use unix socket to transfer data to apache process. I don't see any difference. <snip> > > there are several reasons, i.e. reusing mod_ssl for ssl handling and > other similar cases. Now we have problems with mod_ssl, and as I see, great problems. And if mod_ssl be a separate module between tcp socket and ordinary apache, life would be easier. tcp_socket -> ssl_handling_module -> multiplexer -> apache_fork I think it's more cleaner structure, than tomorrow apache structure. You don't want ssl? Omit ssl_handling_module in configuration! You don't want multiplexer? Omit it! Best regards, Dmitry. P.S. May be it offtopic, sorry :)