ADM: also removed [MAILER-DAEMON-+ipTDfMb4yj+DF5ql5fIeWjaP6QzmKbOAPkqbRpxaUCLoXVNGOqJhrxct1a4NzLed32xSJk9DVwZ1ixq0MFyXQ==
[email protected] Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:14:23 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.metuxmpm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
- [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- --ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Also removed this address. He/She seems to be subscribed with another address (same localpart). cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT services phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/ fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [email protected] cellphone: +49 174 7066481 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Diese Mail wurde mit UUCP versandt. http://www.metux.de/uucp/ --ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: (from uucp@localhost) by metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.7) with UUCP id h967BFW5006904 for [email protected]; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:11:15 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost) by jengate.thur.de (8.12.10/8.12.9) id h96770pD025019; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:10:30 +0200 Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:10:30 +0200 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[email protected]> Message-Id: <200310060710.h96770pD025019-+ipTDfMb4ygqBVzcWMN6mQ@public.gmane.org> To: <[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="h96770pD025019.1065424230/jengate.thur.de" Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) This is a MIME-encapsulated message --h96770pD025019.1065424230/jengate.thur.de The original message was received at Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:05:59 +0200 from localhost [127.0.0.1] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <[email protected]> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to relay.dgap.mipt.ru.: >>> STARTTLS <<< 454 TLS not available: missing RSA private key (#4.3.0) 550 5.1.2 <[email protected]>... Host unknown (Name server: ns1.idlestudios.com.: host not found) ... while talking to mail.reality-bytez.com.: >>> STARTTLS <<< 454 TLS not available: missing certificate (#4.3.0) --h96770pD025019.1065424230/jengate.thur.de Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; jengate.thur.de Arrival-Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:05:59 +0200 Final-Recipient: RFC822; [email protected] Action: failed Status: 5.1.2 Remote-MTA: DNS; ns1.idlestudios.com Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:08:56 +0200 --h96770pD025019.1065424230/jengate.thur.de Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from jengate.thur.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jengate.thur.de (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9675wpT025005; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:05:59 +0200 Received: from nibiru.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by jengate.thur.de (8.12.10/8.12.6/Submit) with bsmtp id h9675EYf024991; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:05:14 +0200 Received: (from metux/listserv@localhost) by metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.7) id h96743GJ001202 for metuxmpm-outgoing; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:04:03 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: nibiru.metux.de: metux/listserv set sender to [email protected] using -f Received: (from weigelt@localhost) by metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.7) id h96741K9001189 for [email protected]; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:04:01 +0200 Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:04:01 +0200 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: [metuxmpm] ADM: removed user [MAILER-DAEMON-iwfKpA2/[email protected]: failure notice] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-Message-Flag: Wer Outlook verwendet handelt unverantwortlich und grob fahrlaessig! Verwenden Sie _unbedingt_ einen anderen Mailclient! Sender: [email protected] Precedence: normal Reply-To: [email protected] - [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi folks, I've removed him, since his mails are bouncing for some days. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT services phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/ fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [email protected] cellphone: +49 174 7066481 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Diese Mail wurde mit UUCP versandt. http://www.metux.de/uucp/ --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: (from uucp@localhost) by metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.7) with UUCP id h966lEOr021922 for [email protected]; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:47:14 +0200 Received: from tibor.swiftdsl.com.au (tibor.swiftdsl.com.au [202.154.92.226]) by jengate.thur.de (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h966kNpT024404 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:46:25 +0200 Message-Id: <200310060646.h966kNpT024404-+ipTDfMb4ygqBVzcWMN6mQ@public.gmane.org> Received: (qmail 3899 invoked for bounce); 6 Oct 2003 06:46:13 -0000 Date: 6 Oct 2003 06:46:13 -0000 From: MAILER-DAEMON-iwfKpA2/[email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: failure notice Hi. This is the qmail-send program at tibor.swiftdsl.com.au. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <kryton-wh2Gl981Flk0n/[email protected]>: The users mailfolder is over the allowed quota (size). --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: (qmail 3885 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2003 06:46:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO m1.dnsix.com) ([63.251.171.167]) (envelope-sender <[email protected]>) by tibor.swiftdsl.com.au (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for <kryton-wh2Gl981Flk0n/[email protected]>; 6 Oct 2003 06:46:12 -0000 Received: from [217.17.193.190] (helo=jengate.thur.de) by m1.dnsix.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1A6P5F-0001Xt-00 for [email protected]; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 23:43:06 -0700 Received: from jengate.thur.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jengate.thur.de (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h966c0pT024195; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:38:00 +0200 Received: from nibiru.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by jengate.thur.de (8.12.10/8.12.6/Submit) with bsmtp id h966bHCl024184; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:37:17 +0200 Received: (from metux/listserv@localhost) by metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.7) id h966a2RF014947 for metuxmpm-outgoing; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:36:02 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: nibiru.metux.de: metux/listserv set sender to [email protected] using -f Received: (from uucp@localhost) by metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.7) with UUCP id h966ZC3F013240 for [email protected]; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:35:12 +0200 Received: from dgap-gw.mipt.ru (dgap-gw.mipt.ru [194.85.81.130]) by jengate.thur.de (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h966WZpU024025 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <[email protected]>; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:32:36 +0200 Received: (qmail 7620 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2003 06:32:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kenwood.dgap.mipt.ru) ([194.85.81.138]) (envelope-sender <[email protected]>) by dgap-gw.mipt.ru (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for <[email protected]>; 6 Oct 2003 06:32:35 -0000 From: "Dmitry P. Schegolev" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [metuxmpm] Metuxmpm test failed Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:29:18 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <1064496781.6710.63.camel-Qbc1XiJbIx94JyBok0HCYPDwsYJMFQGK@public.gmane.org> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310061029.18914.dmitry-8vtNIAoMdG7Dd9xlW2Tctw@public.gmane.org> Sender: [email protected] Precedence: normal Reply-To: [email protected] - [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > separate program, not apache program, which only get data from tcp socket > > and multiplex it to ordinary apache process rely on http header. > > too slow, too resource intensive. Why? What difference? Now separate apache program do the same. It's called multiplexer. As I understood, It now use unix socket to transfer data to apache process. I don't see any difference. <snip> > > there are several reasons, i.e. reusing mod_ssl for ssl handling and > other similar cases. Now we have problems with mod_ssl, and as I see, great problems. And if mod_ssl be a separate module between tcp socket and ordinary apache, life would be easier. tcp_socket -> ssl_handling_module -> multiplexer -> apache_fork I think it's more cleaner structure, than tomorrow apache structure. You don't want ssl? Omit ssl_handling_module in configuration! You don't want multiplexer? Omit it! Best regards, Dmitry. P.S. May be it offtopic, sorry :) --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50-- --h96770pD025019.1065424230/jengate.thur.de-- --ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ--