Does mod_backhand need the filebase ?
[email protected] Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:14:03 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-backhand.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF3287F87B.4A26FEA8-ONC1256EB4.00380330-C1256EB4.003837C1@net> |
Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. --=_alternative 003837BEC1256EB4_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi ! If I have a webserver with mod_backend installed, which passes requests to backend-servers with also mod_backend installed, are the scripts passed through, or does it need the same filebase (common fileserver) ? Example: Having a script which is generating images, how actualy does mod_backhand work ? Are the images saved on the backend server, or on the frontend which recieves the requests ? Thanks in advance... JH --=_alternative 003837BEC1256EB4_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi ! </font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">If I have a webserver with mod_backend installed, which passes requests to backend-servers with also mod_backend installed, are the scripts passed through, or does it need the same filebase (common fileserver) ?</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Example:</font> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Having a script which is generating images, how actualy does mod_backhand work ? Are the images saved on the backend server, or on the frontend which recieves the requests ?</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks in advance...</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">JH</font> --=_alternative 003837BEC1256EB4_=--