Re: load balance
Jim Richardson <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Apr 2003 14:32:51 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-backhand.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 01:56:04PM -0400, Theo E. Schlossnagle wrote: > Eduardo wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Does mod_bakchand knows when a web server is not responding ? > > > >I want to build a web server (2 machines) with load balance, but what if > >one of > >then go down (not the machine, the httpd service) ? The live machine > >will know > >(will recalculate the cost to each one in "real time") that the other > >one has died ? > > Yes. mod_backhand knows when any of the machines are unavailable. I am considering mod_backhand on a three server system, two of them are LAMP backends, and the third, is the frontend site. I noticed in the docs for mod_backhand that it seemed really geared for massive clusters of machines. Would I see a real benefit with only 2 (or maybe 3 if I can rearange some stuff) machines in the cluster? -- Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock Linux, because eventually, you grow up enough to be trusted with a fork()