Re: help - module not working.
"Jeremy May" <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:49:55 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-layout |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Ah. Well. Never mind then. That's the same behaviour I get with > mod_layout 4.0.2a. Rats! It was worth a shot. Looks like I need to > start scrambling for a different header/footer package, or resign myself > to being Content Owner as well as WebMaster for my web sites. We're > moving to RPM maintained Apache and PHP by the end of February. > > Erik Costlow wrote: >> I got mod_layout to work just fine when only one part (the header, page, >> or >> footer) processed any php. >> However, if it more than one of them did, the included pages were blank. >> >> Maybe the with-apxs2filter option when compiling php would help out. >> >> My apache might have been wrong, so how do you set up the apache2 >> pre-fork >> (I was using the SuSE default prefork)? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul E. Ross >> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 3:35 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Mod_layout] help - module not working. >> >> Return question: Has anyone compiled mod_layout-3.2 against Apache 2.0 >> and >> php-4.2 for use in a pre-fork environment? We do not need the thread >> safe >> apache and I have been told that pre-fork 2.0 is pretty much the same as >> apache 1.3 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mod_layout mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.tangent.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_layout >> > > > -- > Paul Ross > Senior Software Engineer > Raytheon Technical Services Company LLC > 281.280.2997 > 281.280.4138 fax > 713.736.9581 pager > [email protected] > http://www.opengov.us > _______________________________________________ > Mod_layout mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.tangent.org/mailman/listinfo/mod_layout > why do that. move to a debian solution. but still i cant get mod_layout to work anyone got any other method of doing something similar? --jeremy