Re: Apache 2 ,mls on Mac OS X

George,
Ian Holsman sent me his Apache 2 mod_log_spread.c earlier this week. I
assume this is the same as the Apache 2 cvs branch.

What I'm most confused about is that the DSO compile (using apxs) seems to
go fine but there is no mod_log_spread.so produced (there is a
mod_log_spread.la etc.). My lack of familiarity with Apache 2 means that I
don=B9t know whether this is what is expected or whether theres something dee=
p
and mysteriously OS X/Libtool related going on!

Any advice you can give me on compiling DSO's with Apache 2 would be most
welcome.
Al Fleming

> From: George Schlossnagle <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:45:47 -0400
> To: Al Fleming <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [mls-users] Apache 2 ,mls on Mac OS X
>=20
> Did you check out the apache2 branch from cvs?  The stock tarball will
> not work with apache2.
>=20
> Al Fleming wrote:
>=20
>> Its great that m_l_s is being ported to Apache 2. However, as and Apache=
 2
>> newbie, I am having real problems figuring out how to compile m_l_s as a=
 DSO
>> via apxs.
>>=20
>> We're installing onto Mac OS X and already have the latest versions of
>> Spread, Spreadlogd and m_l_s (Apache 1.3.26) compiled and running fine. =
We
>> now have apache 2 compiled and running.
>>=20
>> When I try to run /usr/local/apache2/binapxs -c -lspread mod_log_spread.=
c
>> the compile seems to go fine, but I end up with no mod_log_spread.so
>> (theres an .slo, o, lo, la and even a .lai in the .libs directory)
>>=20
>> Can anyone shed any light on how I might get this working?
>>=20
>> Regards,
>> Al Fleming
>> 430am Ltd.
>>=20
>>=20
>> _______________________________________________
>> mls-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.backhand.org/mailman/listinfo/mls-users
>>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> mls-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.backhand.org/mailman/listinfo/mls-users