Re: Apache::Reload versioning

Fred Moyer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl.devel
Message-ID <CAHrynWCwq9z_h5AUGk_wpdJtDSd4XhEUrxZCNRgb0QxY1xJXBA@mail.gmail.com>
I have usually ended up committing the rc number by mistake; hasn't caused
any issues for me over several releases.
On Apr 22, 2015 10:34 AM, "Steve Hay" <[email protected]> wrote:

> The current RELEASE notes for Apache::Reload say that after bumping
> the version number from X.YY-dev to X.YY-rc1 in the Changes file, this
> change should not be committed, and says "(see dev@ archives)" by way
> of an explanation.
>
> However, I have searched the archives and cannot find any explanation
> for this bizarre directive. Does anyone know the reason?
>
> (I'm about to make an RC1 for Apache-Reload so that we can include the
> latest code via an official release into the forthcoming
> mod_perl-2.0.9.)
>
> For the record, when I made Apache-Test-1.39, I *did* commit the -rc1
> edit to the Changes file since there was no instruction not to in that
> case. I cannot see that any harm has come from it, nor how it could do
> in the future.
>
> We don't bother tagging release candidates, but it might help someone
> in the future looking back through the svn history to see which
> commits represented different RCs, if anyone is interested.
>
> Unless I'm overlooking something that anyone can shed some light on
> then I will remove the instruction from Apache-Reload before making
> RC1.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.