Re: svn commit: r1676417 - /perl/modperl/trunk/src/modules/perl/modperl_interp.c

Jan Kaluža <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 05/14/2015 07:42 PM, Steve Hay wrote:
> On 14 May 2015 at 12:48, Jan Kaluža <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 05/14/2015 11:24 AM, Niko Tyni wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 01:47:19PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 28 April 2015 at 07:51,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Author: jkaluza
>>>>> Date: Tue Apr 28 06:51:12 2015
>>>>> New Revision: 1676417
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1676417
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> Initialize interp->refcnt to 1 in modperl_interp_select.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I cannot understand why, but since this patch was applied I find that
>>>> t\modules\proxy.t fails every time when I run the full "nmake test",
>>>> but it always succeeds when I run it in isolation so I'm at a loss to
>>>> find out what is going wrong. All other tests (apart from those known
>>>> Win32-specific failures documented in README) still pass. Reverting
>>>> the patch "fixes" the proxy.t problem, but probably isn't the right
>>>> solution.
>>
>>
>> It's caused by Perl_croak/modperl_croak.
>>
>> Lets take modperl_run_filter as an example. When following code-path is
>> executed ...
>>
>>                  modperl_croak(aTHX_ MODPERL_FILTER_ERROR,
>>                                "a filter calling $f->read "
>>                                "must return OK and not DECLINED");
>>
>> ... the MP_INTERP_PUTBACK is not reached for some reason (I presume it's
>> because of Perl_croak, but I don't understand why it stops the execution of
>> the rest of modperl_run_filter method).
>>
>> Because of that, the interp->refcnt is not decreased, and the interp is not
>> freed.
>>
>> I has been able to "fix" it by attached patch, but I would like to discuss
>> more generic way how to fix that problem...
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>
> modperl_croak() calls Perl_croak(), which is an XS interface to Perl's
> die() function, so surely you wouldn't expect anything immediately
> after it to be run?
>
> I'm not sure exactly where it does end up, though. It must be getting
> caught by some eval somewhere since we aren't exiting the process, but
> presumably it wouldn't be possible to do appropriate clean-up wherever
> it lands up unless there is some mechanism for registering required
> clean-up behaviour? Otherwise maybe we need to pass interp into
> modperl_croak(), or into a new version of that if not all cases
> require it, so that it can do the MP_INTERP_PUTBACK(interp, aTHX)
> call?
>

What worries me here a bit is that we would have to MP_INTEPR_PUTBACK 
the PerlInterp which is later used for PerlCroak, if I understand it right.

I have found out that usually when modperl_croak is called, the refcnt 
of the interp is above 1, so it wouldn't get freed prematurely, but still.

I think for now we should putback the interp only when interp->refcnt > 
1, it wouldn't fully fix all bugs, but lot of them would be fixed by that.

If someone knows how Perl_croak works and if it's possible to cleanup 
the interp after that, it would be great to share that info .

Regards,
Jan Kaluza
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.