Re: [VOTE] Release libapreq2-2.16

Joe Orton <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:26:53 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl.devel
Organization	Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham (US), Michael O'Neill (Ireland), Paul Argiry (US)
Message-ID	<YFHLXSJNL5mrXhlZ__44816.4627350465$1615973230$gmane$org@redhat.com>

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:05:14PM +0000, Joe Orton wrote:
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next week to release this candidate 
> tarball as v2.16:
> 
> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
> 
> MD5, SHA-256, and SHA-512 checksums for the tarball are as follows:
> 
> c0f4fbeee7514ea22a038933d0075f8e  libapreq2-2.16.tar.gz
> e04c855a3ea070b8863569fbae02fe828f534ac88755b23e24d3863cc9598349  libapreq2-2.16.tar.gz
> aa9e751a3f0d6a9cb587aa1c5408e8d9a073560860d7f653776196fe3739516df16abe943c9cb0460cfb9b68a2d79ad651cfd5e4a30a2ca34d6dc3ced73f628c  libapreq2-2.16.tar.gz

+1 for release from me, builds and tests OK.

I wonder if the embedded libapreq2 library version (APREQ_*_VERSION in 
library/apreq_versions.h) should be bumped from 2.8.1, it seems to be 
disconenected from the tarball release version, but this doesn't seem 
harmful.

I'll let the vote run for a few more hours then tally a result.

Regards, Joe