Re: A ghost in the machine?
Tosh Cooey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl |
|---|---|
| Organization | Twelve Hundred Group LLC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ha ha! The ghost is me, I'm an archaic leftover! I did say I been in
this for 15 years ;)
Well Gang, we solved the smaller @_ mystery but not the larger
"different behaviour under mod_perl" mystery. I have my bets on it
being Old Man Jenkins trying to scare everybody away by wearing a costume.
So?
Thanks Eric...
Tosh
Eric Howe wrote:
> Hi Tosh,
>
> The function sigil ("&") is an archaic left over from before perl5. Calling a function as "&cfg" is the same as saying "&cfg(@_)" and that implicit "@_" was probably the source of your problem. A bit more information can be found here:
>
> http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?subroutines_called_with_the_ampersand
>
> Executive summary: don't use "&" on a sub unless you need a sub-ref:
>
> my $x = \&cfg;
> $x->();
>
>
> On 2010-01-14, at 13:28 , Tosh Cooey wrote:
>
>> Ok now I'm really boggled...
>>
>> If I use:
>>
>> my $vars = { config => &cfg() };
>> instead of:
>> my $vars = { config => &cfg };
>>
>> Then it works! So what's the difference between &cfg and &cfg() when it comes to mod_perl, or at least ModPerl::Registry?
>>
>> Thank-you all...
>>
>> Tosh
>>
>>
>> Tosh Cooey wrote:
>>> True, good point. I cleaned up my code and changed some things around and I still have the same problem:
>>> index.pl
>>> ########
>>> use MyConfig;
>>> use ClientConf;
>>> use MyUser;
>>> my $vars = { config => &cfg };
>>> MyConfig.pm
>>> ###########
>>> package MyConfig;
>>> use strict;
>>> use Exporter;
>>> use vars qw(@ISA @EXPORT);
>>> @ISA = qw(Exporter);
>>> @EXPORT = qw(&cfg &user);
>>> my %CFG = { global vars... };
>>> sub cfg {
>>> return ClientConf->new();
>>> }
>>> sub user {
>>> return MyUser->new();
>>> }
>>> 1;
>>> The function "user" works just fine, it returns the object as expected.
>>> #### BREAK ####
>>> So, while I was testing to make sure everything works exactly as I described above I discovered unexpected behaviour. &cfg is actually:
>>> sub cfg {
>>> my ($cfg_var) = @_;
>>> if ($cfg_var) {
>>> ...do something...
>>> } else {
>>> return ClientConf->new();
>>> }
>>> }
>>> &user is exactly as noted above. When I changed &user and added the same $cfg_var and conditional it also did not return what I expected.
>>> So basically the problem I'm having is that even though I'm calling &cfg without arguments that $cfg_var is evaluating as "TRUE", but only under ModPerl::Registry and not under regular unadulterated PERL.
>>> As a PERL user for 15 years am I just the biggest newbie ever, or is there something obscure going on that I should know about?
>>> Thanks for anything!
>>> Tosh
>>> Ihnen, David wrote:
>>>> Global? There's no need to use a global here. You only ever reference %CFG *in* the package... so just make it package scoped - it'll act like a static variable and persist. (scope it with 'my' and remove it from the export)
>>>>
>>>> You can always get the value you want with a call to MyConfig::cfg
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Tosh Cooey [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 10:45 AM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: A ghost in the machine?
>>>>
>>>> Hi to everyone!
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to find out if I'm passing objects properly under mod_perl because something is not working as I expect.
>>>>
>>>> index.pl
>>>> ########
>>>> use MyConfig;
>>>> my $vars = { config => &cfg };
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> MyConfig.pm
>>>> ###########
>>>> package MyConfig;
>>>>
>>>> use strict;
>>>> use Exporter;
>>>> use vars qw(@ISA @EXPORT %CFG );
>>>> use ClientConf;
>>>> @ISA = qw(Exporter);
>>>> @EXPORT = qw(%CFG &cfg);
>>>>
>>>> %CFG = { global vars... };
>>>>
>>>> sub cfg {
>>>> my $CFG{$clientID} = new ClientConf;
>>>> return $CFG{$clientID};
>>>> }
>>>> 1;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Under normal PERL $vars->{config} is a MyConfig object. Under mod_perl nothing is returned. Debugging with "print" statements in &cfg shows me that "ref $CFG{$clientID}" is ClientConf, the object is there, but upon return it just disappears.
>>>>
>>>> I have other functions which "return new MyUser()" and these work perfectly, so I'm thinking that the problem lies with the global variable "$CFG" and that something which I think should be happening is NOT happening.
>>>>
>>>> I'm flummoxed...
>>>>
>>>> Thank-you for any insights!
>>>>
>>>> Tosh
>>>>
>> --
>> McIntosh Cooey - Twelve Hundred Group LLC - http://www.1200group.com/
>
>
> Eric Howe
> [email protected]
>
>
--
McIntosh Cooey - Twelve Hundred Group LLC - http://www.1200group.com/