Re: Apache2::SubProcess sucks
Tosh Cooey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl |
|---|---|
| Organization | Twelve Hundred Group LLC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It does, but Proc::Daemon closes a billion file handles and sets new process IDs and forks and forks and maybe forks a couple more times for good measure... Fingers crossed! I do enjoy the fact that nobody really seems to have a simple definitive vanilla fork/spawn process down pat, it seems everyone does what I do, trying this and that stumbling about until they come up with some monstrosity like Torsen has that works under the sheer weight of tricks. Tosh [email protected] wrote: > On Feb 20, 2010, at 7:01 AM, Tosh Cooey wrote: > >> Anyway, the solution, at least so far until I run into other problems, >> seems to be to just make a system() call and the called program uses >> Proc::Daemon and things *seem* to work fine in testing, we'll see when >> it hits production... >> >> Tosh >> > Doesn't a process that calls 'system' wait for the child > process to complete? If the parent process is an Apache > child, is that in keeping with what you're trying to do? > > cmac > > -- McIntosh Cooey - Twelve Hundred Group LLC - http://www.1200group.com/