Re: [PATCH] END blocks may segfault

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 09:50:00PM -0700, Fred Moyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Alex Hunsaker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Another option would be to copy/local() the array in
> > modpler_perl_call_list.  Of course that still wont get it "right"
> > because we wont run any newly defined subs... But at least we wont
> > segfault/crap out.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> 
> I think getting rid of the segfault is a good thing.  But if the main
> problem is issues with NYTProf, then it seems like this change won't
> solve the core problem of autogenerated null end blocks faulting.  I'm
> don't fully understand the scope of these issues yet, so my answers
> (and questions) may not be completely helpful.

I suggest the code shift items off the main array, like perl does,
but also push those items onto a new temp array.
When there are no more items in the main array it would copy
the items back again (av_make() is handy for that).

Tim.