Re: mod_perl EC2 AMI's or other platform providers?
André Warnier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > On 4 Jul 2011, at 11:03, Tosh Cooey wrote: > >> The only public AMI for EC2 setup with mod_perl I can easily find is an OpenSuse one from 2009. >> >> Services like Bitnami are a really nice platform for launching LAMP stacks, unfortunately the P is anything but Perl :( >> >> Is there a reason for the lack of plug'n'play mod_perl LAMP cloud service providers? Or are there a ton that I just don't know about? >> > > Because you really should build your own perl, mod_perl and Apache stack. > Come now. I don't know the relevance of the above original question, nor the merits of that particular target platform. But who nowadays is still building their own Apache/mod_perl/perl set ? We have about 50 Apache/mod_perl/perl servers running, in-house and at customers, on a variety of platforms, and I cannot remember having to build any of them over the last 3-4 years at least. Which is very sweet, because as a sysadmin and applications programmer, I really don't feel like having to go hunting for missing dependencies, compatible versions, or outdated definitions in some .h file. And I don't really have the time to do that either. And for at least some of these platforms, I don't have the knowledge to do that easily either. Tosh, the real answer is that all these software packages are open-source and free (as in free beer), so creating a package for some specific platform is only done when someone volunteers to do it (and maintain it) for that platform, and then makes it available for others. And I guess that this has not happened (yet) for the particular platform which you mention. So you could probably render a service to the community by doing this, and posting the results somewhere. Alternatively, I guess that you could ask Amazon themselves how to go about doing that.