Re: mod_perl EC2 AMI's or other platform providers?
Tosh Cooey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl |
|---|---|
| Organization | Twelve Hundred Group LLC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/4/11 7:54 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > > On 4 Jul 2011, at 11:03, Tosh Cooey wrote: > >> The only public AMI for EC2 setup with mod_perl I can easily find is an OpenSuse one from 2009. >> >> Services like Bitnami are a really nice platform for launching LAMP stacks, unfortunately the P is anything but Perl :( >> >> Is there a reason for the lack of plug'n'play mod_perl LAMP cloud service providers? Or are there a ton that I just don't know about? > > > Glad you're happy with perl 5.8.8 and old, possibly buggy CPAN modules. > I'm not happy, hence the complaining about the AMI from 2009. But I'm glad you changed the subject from your first one, which is that I should build my own stack. So basically you are saying (and only you, not a community voice) that in order to be a mod_perl developer one also needs to: 1) Build and optimize Apache. 2) Build and optimize MySql. 3) Build and optimize Perl+mod_perl. 4) Build and optimize a Linux server environment. or 5) Have enough money to pay for all of the above. I understand the Renaissance Man appeal, we all want to be da Vinci, but that's hardly practical when a good dev needs to know perl, JS, some JS library (ie. jQuery), HTML, and CSS. And let's be honest, what hot admin who can do 1-4 above really wants to perfect their knowledge of CSS and JS?! And to address Herr Schumacher, of course no mod_perl environment will be perfect, they will all need to be tweaked, but changing a startup.pl and adding needed modules is not the same as steps 1-4 above. You could just say, "what you complain about seems to be a hole in the market" rather than trying to dismiss the need. Tosh -- McIntosh Cooey - Twelve Hundred Group LLC - http://www.1200group.com/