Re: Coupling Plack/PSGI with mod_perl, or an alternate architecture?

> Has anyone on this list actually run a Plack application *inside*
> mod_perl?
Yes.

> how one does that.
<http://p3rl.org/Plack::Handler::Apache2>

> relative merits of this approach?
It is very similar to the way traditional mod_perl apps are deployed
and therefore familiar.

> reasons to pick a mod_perl approach over a plack runner approach
Requires no proxying. More reasons in
<http://www.catalystframework.org/calendar/2007/17#Motivation>; don't
get confused about the deployment notes, that was before the
switch-over to PSGI.

> would you pick a different approach?
Catalyst main mindshare is that if decoupling is desired, to achieve it
through mod_fastcgi/FastCgiExternalServer.
<http://wiki.catalystframework.org/wiki/deployment>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlB100wACgkQFtlTdOX00Ho7rQCgmY5ZcERUx48273ra4LbGpuIm
z88An2c9JxHRmJHlwdOEicjmHVKEBp6k
=oJJX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----