Re: automatically restart httpd
Jim Albert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl |
|---|---|
| Organization | Netrition - The Internet's Premier Nutrition Superstore! |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/23/2013 3:27 PM, Ryan Perry wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Jim Albert <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 4/23/2013 2:33 PM, Ryan Perry wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Jim Albert <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > On 4/23/2013 1:36 PM, Ryan Perry wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Jim Albert > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote: > > On 4/23/2013 1:08 PM, Ryan Perry wrote: > > I've considered doing it daily via cron, but > if there's > a way to > do when > I hit this error I'd prefer that. > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Jim Albert > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>> > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>>> wrote: > > On 4/23/2013 11:49 AM, Ryan Perry wrote: > > I've been plagued by some bug that > makes a > call to LWP > stop working: > "Can't connect to 192.168.0.222 (Bad > hostname)" > > I haven't been able to figure out > why, but a > simple httpd > restart fixes > it for a day or 2. > > Since I can't figure out a real fix, I'm > wondering if > there is a > way for > me to automatically restart httpd > whenever the bug > hits. Maybe > whenever > it appears in the httpd-error.log? > What are > my options? > > > Without more to go on to the actual cause > of the > problem... > > Restarting apache daily isn't a bad idea in > general if even > just a > graceful restart. > kill -USR1 `cat /var/run/httpd.pid` > which I believe should be safe any time > of day. > > If a complete restart, maybe early > morning off hours > assuming your > server requires a high degree of > availability? > > Jim > > > Try to remember not to top-post, please. It makes > it hard > for others > to read the thread. > > I don't know, but it kind of has a DNS feel to it, > possibly. Nothing > concrete to go on, just past experience when I see > network > and I > know the network is fine... I think DNS. Maybe reverse > resolution of > your private IP address space assuming your > requests are > being made > to/from private addresses? That's really just a > shot in the > dark > because we don't have much to go on. I'd start > thinking > network and > DNS, put in some debug, see what if anything is > timing out. > > Jim > > > Sorry about the top post. > > I've done the debugging on DNS. If it try changing the > IP/hostname I > still get the error. I think it's per-process though. > Once it > starts > to happen it's intermittent and gets worse, making me think > depending > which process I hit it will work or not until all > processes are > affected. > > This is on FreeBSD using a jailed (virtualized) host. > I read about > apache/jails on OpenBSD having a config issue with DNS > but it seemed > different than this. > > It only seems to affect httpd, I can log in and ping > from the server > just fine. > > > Also, please reply to the list, not personal email addresses so > everyone else gets the benefit of the thread, and maybe you > get a > better answer from someone other than me. :) > > I'm not so sure you've eliminated DNS, yet. > > What if from 192.168.0.222 you: > dig -x 192.168.0.x > > where 192.168.0.x is the IP addressing making the connection to > 192.168.0.222 > > Do you have reverse resolvers for your private address > space or are > the requests handled by the top level root servers? > > Who is answering for that reverse resolution request? > dig -x 192.168.0.x > Is it your resolver or a root level like prisoner.iana.org > <http://prisoner.iana.org> > <http://prisoner.iana.org> > > > Jim > > > Interesting, but it seems hard to believe that would be it. I don't > have any other suspects though... > > > ; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P3 <<>> -x 192.168.0.200 > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 20209 > ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, > ADDITIONAL: 0 > > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;200.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa.__INPTR > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > 168.192.in-addr.arpa.__10800INSOAlocalhost. nobody.invalid. 1 > 3600 1200 > > 604800 10800 > > ;; Query time: 6 msec > ;; SERVER: 4.2.2.1#53(4.2.2.1) > ;; WHEN: Tue Apr 23 18:28:37 2013 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 103 > > You're using a public resolver... 4.2.2.1 > I'm not saying that's your problem, but I've had problems in the > past where connections were slow or timed out doing a reverse lookup > of my private address space. The problem went away after configuring > my own resolvers to handle reverse lookups on my private address space. > > If you want to continue to use 4.2.2.1 or any public resolver as > your resolver, that's not an option. > > If you have your own resolvers, this might help: > http://www.sendmail.com/sm/__open_source/tips/private_dns/ > <http://www.sendmail.com/sm/open_source/tips/private_dns/> > > Again... I'm still kind of shooting in the dark, so my confidence > level on where I'm going with this is not high. > > You really should put some debug in or maybe a packet trace... is > your server actually getting the request is where I would start. > > Does your ISP provide a resolver? Is there a reason you want to use > 4.2.2.1 rather than your ISP's or your own or maybe at least > Google's at 8.8.8.8? > > Jim > > > I do want to continue using it. 4.2.2.1 is L3's server. 8.8.8.8 is > acutally my secondary. If it were actually the DNS server it would > affect more than just apache, right? > > I'd be interested in putting in some debug code, but I don't know where. > I'm just now reading about LWP::Debug. That would depend on what processes attempt a reverse resolution. Some might do it simply for logging purposes. That was my problem before I set up reverse resolution of my private address space. Again this is all supposition. Jim