Re: Compiling 2.0.9 with Strawberry Perl 5.20 on windows (64Bit)

> I will make new binaries for 2.0.9 soon, but want to get mod_perl

> working with Perl 5.22.x first.

That is great I will be looking forward to it.
Will that be for Apache 2.4 or 2.2, or both ?

2.09 with Strawberry Perl 5.22 and Apache 2.4. It sound like a winner!


Thanks,

Thomas
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Hay <[email protected]>
To: Thomas den Braber <[email protected]>
Cc: "A. Warnier" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:09:44 +0000
Subject: Re: Compiling 2.0.9 with Strawberry Perl 5.20 on windows (64Bit)


On 28 September 2015 at 09:44, Thomas den Braber <[email protected] 
[mailto:thomas%40delos.nl]> wrote:
>
>
>> Not directly an answer, but you may want to have a look here :
>> http://people.apache.org/~stevehay/ [http://people.apache.org/~stevehay/]
>
> I am already using those, working very well but wanted to test the 2.0.9 
and
> better with Apache 2.4.
> I also would like to be able to compile it my self.
>
> @Steve Hay:  Can you explain how you setup your build environment ?
>

Unfortunately, mod_perl doesn't currently support dmake builds, so
doesn't build directly with either ActivePerl or StrawberryPerl.

I hope to add dmake support in the nearish future, but in the meantime
one has to build with Visual C++/nmake (preferably (or maybe
*necessarily*? I'm not sure) with an old VC that links against the old
unversioned msvcrt.dll for compatibility with gcc binaries).

I will make new binaries for 2.0.9 soon, but want to get mod_perl
working with Perl 5.22.x first.