Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module
Michael Bochkaryov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAExkHc3_u0V5dUWJMx68JiBW3aV_U0LXuNHB+31oN2FQv4WmHg@mail.gmail.com> |
There's compatibility list - seems quite good to use in production: http://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/misc/browser-compatibility.html On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Igor Chudov <[email protected]> wrote: > This mathml and asciimath is extremely interesting! Thank you! You are > awesome! > > I was a little unclear what browsers it works with, I would have to do > some testing. I hope that it is compatible with all modern browsers and > cell phones and such. If not it would not work, but if it is then I would > be delighted! I use something similar to asciimath internally, that I > developed 12 years ago, should not be hard to translate as I parse all > formulas deeply. > > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Michael Bochkaryov <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> >> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Ruben Safir <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > GD::Graph is something that is not going to kill me (like if CGI.pm >>> became >>> > unavailable) but it is certainly a concern. >>> > >>> > Are there any alternatives to it? >>> > >>> imagemajic maybe >>> >> >> It also make sense to try something like this: >> https://www.mathjax.org/ >> >> Seems modern browsers may allow to move rendering to client side that >> also may decrease load on backend. >> >> >> Regards, >> Michael Bochkaryov >> >> >