Re: [Slightly OT] Apache::AuthCookie and mod_perl version 1.x
André Warnier (tomcat) <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi. From a heavy (indirect) user of Apache2::AuthCookie (and it's 2.4 incantation), first of all, thanks. And in particular, thank you for the work done to make this compatible with the changes in Apache 2.4, despite the paucity of original documentation available. And I don't speak for everyone, but as far as I am concerned, I would indeed vote for retiring the 1.x version code. Note: I do not really use the released Apache2::AuthCookie as such, having long ago derived my own version of it and added multiple alternative things which make it unshareable, but I regularly refer to the latest code of Apache2::AuthCookie to keep mine up-to-date. So again, thanks. André On 31.07.2017 19:57, Michael Schout wrote: > Hi folks. > > Sorry for this slightly off topic thread, but in the past announcements > about AuthCookie were typically made to this list. > > I'm the maintainer of Apache::AuthCookie (and Apache2::AuthCookie) and > am wondering if there are any people out there still using > Apache::AuthCookie under mod_perl version 1.x (and as such apache 1.x)? > > Given that apache 1.3.42 was the final release of Apache 1.3, which was > way back in 2010, I am hoping that everyone has moved on to Apache 2.x > long ago. > > As a result, I would like to formally drop support for Apache 1.3 from > future versions of Apache::AuthCookie. This would allow me to clean up > the dist a bit, and be able to publish a consistent set of dependencies > in META.* in the dist. > > If you really require Apache::AuthCookie under apache 1.3 at this point, > you can get a previous version of AuthCookie from backpan to address that. > > If you really do need AuthCookie and getting it from backpan is a > problem for you, please let me know. > > Thanks! > > Regards, > Michael Schout >