Re: MP framework

We actually use both dancer and modperl. but dancer works separately, it
doesn't require modperl installed.
So I was asking if there is a framework for modperl which behaves as
something like dancer.


On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 05:42 PM, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> On 02.08.2017 11:19, 风河 wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > currently we were developing the methods mostly as handlers.
> > is there a new popular framework for full stack development of modperl?
> >
> Yes, many. See here :
> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=perl+web+development+frameworks
> 
> We (still) use Template::Toolkit, which many people would consider a bit
> old and not 
> really "in fashion". But it works, and is simple to learn and use.
> Other frameworks can be said to be more modern, more elegant, more
> fashionable, etc..
> But in my opinion, the more elegant and abstract a framework is, the
> longer it takes to 
> really dominate it, the more difficult it is to figure out what really
> happens when you 
> have a problem, and the less you are really "in control".
> So the choice is yours, depending on
> - where you are coming from
> - where you want to go
> - what kind of problems you have to solve
> - how deep you still need to go into controlling what Apache does
> - etc..
> There is no "one size fits all", and it is very easy to get into endless
> on-line 
> discussions about which is "the best".
> (Including with people who say that they are looking for "a framework",
> but really mean "a 
> CMS system").
> 
>