Re: Future MPM Support?
"Michael A. Capone" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes, http/2 is our primary concern right now. At the moment, we've made the business decision to stay on mod_perl rather than migrate to another platform and gain http/2 benefits, but for how long can we maintain that decision? I'm honestly not sure. Now, we significantly under-utilize mod_perl, mostly doing CGI registry / code caching. Hey, if it was good 15 years ago, it's good today! :) But that does mean that there are potentially other options for us to explore, as we're not married to all the bells and whistles that mod_perl provides. On 8/4/2018 5:47 AM, Paul Silevitch wrote: > Also issues with http/2 since it is not supported by prefork mpm anymore. > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:44 PM, John Dunlap <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > The biggest deficiency of mod_perl, at the moment, is that it > cannot provide web sockets. In today's world, that's a huge problem. > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Robert Smith > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Who in the world would want to abandon mod_perl? > > What is this world coming to? > > -Robert > > > On Jul 30, 2018, at 5:44 PM, André Warnier (tomcat) > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On 30.07.2018 03:51, Paul B. Henson wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 04:18:54PM -0400, Paul Silevitch wrote: > >>> Like Dr. James Smith, I'm hooking into multiple handlers > and using filters. > >> > >> Yep, me too; Plack is really not a feature equivilent > replacement for > >> mod_perl :(. > >> > > +1. > > Plack and other frameworks (TT2, Moose, Catalyst, etc.) > cover the web application side, at different levels and in > different ways. > > But there is (to my knowledge) no equivalent for mod_perl's > ability to interact deeply with the Apache internal Request > processing logic. > > In that respect, comparing mod_perl to Plack etc is like > comparing apples to pears : not very relevant. > > Considering that, for better or worse, Perl as a programming > language does not seem to be really attractive to the current > generation of software developers anymore, I would not really > mind if some tool equivalent to mod_perl was developed using > whichever other scripting language is currently more in > fashion (javascript ? python ? ..), but it really seems a pity > to "slowly abandon" mod_perl without providing some tool of > equivalent power in terms of deep interaction with Apache httpd. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > John Dunlap > /CTO | Lariat/ > / > / > /*Direct:*/ > /[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>/ > / > *Customer Service:*/ > 877.268.6667 > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >