Re: HTTP and MPM support

John Dunlap <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl
Message-ID <CAC5eUSt0ZKDoQ17Vdbhhii7JPYZ87nGyVXJNsN4cbyDtbEnsbA@mail.gmail.com>
Yes! Lots of traffic is arguably the best kind of problem to have! :) We
can definitely throw servers at the problem and scale horizontally but
those costs add up and I'm afraid that, unless we can somehow get more
concurrency out of mod_perl, a day will come when we're forced to
acknowledge that we can do more work for less money in a different
language. I was really hoping that a different MPM and http/2 would help in
that regard but it's not sounding hopeful. :(

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:18 PM Mark Blackman <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On 28 Jan 2019, at 21:14, John Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Our servers already have 32 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
> cores(if you count hyper threading) so optimization is the road I've been
> going down. I've also Apache::VMonitor to get, at least, *some* insight
> into the internals of mod_perl but I'm uncertain how to use the information
> it gives me to optimize the server.
>
>
> Plenty of traffic sounds like a nice problem to have, more machines then?
> :)  I have a hosting business (UK) on the side (http://www.exonetric.com)
> and would love to sell you some hosting!  On the other hand, if your Perl
> just needs some TLC, then plenty of contractors can help find the hotspots
> and optimise for you.
>
> - Mark
>


-- 
John Dunlap
*CTO | Lariat *

*Direct:*
*[email protected] <[email protected]>*

*Customer Service:*
877.268.6667
[email protected]
100x60.png (image/png, 2.1 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.