Re: [DISCUSS] The future of mod_perl

Ruben Safir <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 09:50:05PM -0400, Jim Albert wrote:
> Not that I want to be the guy that says it sounds like we'll be
> pulling the mod_perl plug at any time the right scenario arises, but
> is it reasonable to have a discussion here on mod_perl alternatives
> inline with the various means of using mod_perl from the low level
> means of interfacing with the Apache server to the quick and dirty
> stuff (ModPerl::PerlRun, I believe to keep Perl and modules in
> memory).
> 

It is not that simple.  I have a website that I have maintained on
mod_perl and embperl since 1992.  It is quite massive and moving it is
frankly not reasonable.  modperl and embperl has been remarkably
flexible and resilent over time and I don't see any reason why it can't
be maintained and essentially adapted to the latest apache source.

When it dies. my website wil for all practocality be dead.


> For those drawing the same conclusions from this thread as me, I've
> seen mod_fcgid proposed as an alternative, but I haven't yet played
> with it. Anyone with similar thoughts would ideally be looking for
> something that doesn't require months of redeveloping to a proposed
> replacement to mod_perl.
> 
> I like mod_perl and it does a good job for what I use it for, but if
> we have no one developing, it sounds like we're waiting for the
> catalyst to come along that puts and end to it. EG.. some future
> Apache incompatibility.  I'd really like someone with mod_perl
> authority to tell me I'm wrong, but my take on Adam's reply pretty
> much leaves me with that conclusion. I don't see another way to draw
> a better conclusion.
> 
> Jim
> 
> On 3/17/2021 8:52 PM, Adam Prime wrote:
> >The projects current state is that no new development happening.
> >This isn't to say that new development shouldn't happen, but it
> >isn't. Apache and Perl both continue to move forward, and we are
> >pretty lucky that the design that Stas, Phillipe, Geoff, etc built
> >mod_perl 2 under is resilient enough to continue to despite the
> >changes that both of these projects have made.
> >
> >So, if the goal of the PMC is to maintain the status quo, then
> >there is essentially no time required, aside from someone needing
> >to file a report every few months saying that nothing has
> >happened, and there were no releases. Things can only remain that
> >way as long as there are no security problems that affect
> >mod_perl, and neither Apache or Perl do anything that really
> >breaks mod_perl.
> >
> >Adam
> >
> >On 3/17/2021 6:10 PM, Geoff Mottram wrote:
> >>All,
> >>
> >>I would certainly hate to see mod_perl no longer being
> >>maintained. I use it as a front-end for a library cataloging
> >>system that is very much alive, in-use and updated with recent
> >>HTML, CSS and JavaScript features. Rewriting this front-end in
> >>some other language would be a huge undertaking and would not
> >>provide much benefit because Apache + Perl + mod_perl not only
> >>do the job but do it extremely well.
> >>
> >>While I don't understand what type of time commitment would be
> >>required, I would be happy to add my name to the bottom of any
> >>list should others have a strong desire to hold such a position.
> >>
> >>Best,
> >>
> >>Geoff Mottram
> >>
> >>On 3/17/2021 3:40 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
> >>>Dear community members,
> >>>
> >>>As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where
> >>>activity reduces to a level such that the project is no longer
> >>>sustainable.  At Apache, projects reach this stage when there
> >>>are not at least 3 active PMC members providing oversight.
> >>>Projects that reach this stage are usually placed in the
> >>>Attic [1] or absorbed by another Apache project willing to
> >>>manage its releases.
> >>>
> >>>If you are interested in seeing mod_perl remain an active
> >>>project, and are able to help maintain and provide oversight,
> >>>please respond in this thread indicating that you are
> >>>interested in performing the duties of a PMC member[2].
> >>>
> >>>Cheers,
> >>>
> >>>Sander Striker
> >>>Director, The Apache Software Foundation
> >>>
> >>>[1] https://attic.apache.org/ <https://attic.apache.org/>
> >>>[2] https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html
> >>><https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html>
> >>>
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> 
> 

-- 
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998
http://www.mrbrklyn.com 

DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002
http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software
http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive 
http://www.coinhangout.com - coins!
http://www.brooklyn-living.com 

Being so tracked is for FARM ANIMALS and extermination camps, 
but incompatible with living as a free human being. -RI Safir 2013
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.