Re: [DISCUSS] The future of mod_perl
Philippe Chiasson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl,gmane.comp.java.hadoop.zookeeper.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <33571F0B-2D62-492C-8BA0-C78E63861D3E__15541.8430034601$1616251060$gmane$org@ectoplasm.org> |
I am also still around and keeping an eye on things, maybe from afar a little, but still here and invested. For myself, I find that one of the challenges in filing board reports is having to effectively report more or less nothing of value, on a schedule that’s just long and infrequent enough to keep overlooking it, basically. Sent from the depths of my mind on an iPhone > On Mar 17, 2021, at 15:40, Sander Striker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear community members, > > As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where activity reduces to a level such that the project is no longer sustainable. At Apache, projects reach this stage when there are not at least 3 active PMC members providing oversight. Projects that reach this stage are usually placed in the Attic [1] or absorbed by another Apache project willing to manage its releases. > > If you are interested in seeing mod_perl remain an active project, and are able to help maintain and provide oversight, please respond in this thread indicating that you are interested in performing the duties of a PMC member[2]. > > Cheers, > > Sander Striker > Director, The Apache Software Foundation > > [1] https://attic.apache.org/ > [2] https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html >