Re: Patch to mod_proxy for fixed reverse mapping support

Manon Goo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.mod-proxy
Message-ID <39221.1028037562@[10.1.0.99]>
I do not think it is a good idea to be able to configure someting inside a 
virtual host that tragets URLs outside it. This is fine in the
"server config"  or in a _default_ virtual host but nowhere else. especialy 
in enviroments whith many virtual hosts, vhost in diffrent includefiles 
edited by different persons.

Manon







--On Dienstag, 30. Juli 2002 13:16 Uhr +0200 Martijn Schoemaker 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The new config will use the target specified in the
> config file 'as-is' and thus has no further link to
> any virtual host or internal configuration what so-
> ever.
>
> Greets,
> Martijn
>
> Manon Goo wrote:
>
>>> also.. what about virtual hosts.. doesn't requiring them to have a
>>> hostname break them?
>
> Doe the new config allow to target URLs outside of the scope of a virtual
> host directive if
> used within a virual host section ?
>
>>
>> There is no requirement to have a hostname - the old behaviour still
>> holds.
>>
>
>
> --
> ------ WARNING: This signature contains a VIRUS ! -------
> - SHLRUIOHUIOWHLNNMSKHKDLWINDOWSJHFHKJLLUIHEKJLNDHKKJHL -
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.