Re: Patch to mod_proxy for fixed reverse mapping support
Manon Goo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-proxy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <39221.1028037562@[10.1.0.99]> |
I do not think it is a good idea to be able to configure someting inside a virtual host that tragets URLs outside it. This is fine in the "server config" or in a _default_ virtual host but nowhere else. especialy in enviroments whith many virtual hosts, vhost in diffrent includefiles edited by different persons. Manon --On Dienstag, 30. Juli 2002 13:16 Uhr +0200 Martijn Schoemaker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The new config will use the target specified in the > config file 'as-is' and thus has no further link to > any virtual host or internal configuration what so- > ever. > > Greets, > Martijn > > Manon Goo wrote: > >>> also.. what about virtual hosts.. doesn't requiring them to have a >>> hostname break them? > > Doe the new config allow to target URLs outside of the scope of a virtual > host directive if > used within a virual host section ? > >> >> There is no requirement to have a hostname - the old behaviour still >> holds. >> > > > -- > ------ WARNING: This signature contains a VIRUS ! ------- > - SHLRUIOHUIOWHLNNMSKHKDLWINDOWSJHFHKJLLUIHEKJLNDHKKJHL - > --------------------------------------------------------- >