Re: Siteminder/mod_proxy issues
Martijn Schoemaker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-proxy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Checked them and limits are set to 8Kb and looking at the header sizes they don't exceed that. I did some other testing however and I don't think we are going to like this... I put back an old libproxy.so from our (working) version shipped with apache 1.3.12 into apach 1.3.26. And when I sniff the whole kit'n kaboodle again I don't see the cookie duplication! If I put back the version of 1.3.26, I DO see cookie duplication! Does anybody know what might cause this ? I know siteminder depends on a patch which inserts an : ap_overlay_tables() statement which is already in the version of 1.3.26. Has something been changed in relation to passing headers to other modules ? Might this statement now causing headers to be added twice ? Cheers, Martijn Schoemaker Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > Be aware that it *is* possible to get SM to produce a cookie sooooo big > that it hits the 1024 (or wathever) single MIME line length limit of > apache. See > > LimitRequestLine (http_core.c) > LimitRequestFieldsize (http_core.c) > > and friends for more info. > > Dw. > > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Martijn Schoemaker wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We use SM 4.51 and not yet the QMR4 web-agent. Will install > > and try this out right away. In any case, this does not seem > > to be a mod_proxy problem anyway. I did some more checking > > and the browser problems are probably caused by the Set-Cookie > > headers which are set multiple times. Also, the Cookies them- > > selves for the user that works are smaller that the ones for > > the user that don't work and this prolly gives strange effects > > in IE (who whould have guessed ? :)) > > > > Anyway, this seems more like a SM/Cookie/RFC issue and has no > > further relation with mod_proxy. > > > > Thanks all who replied for the input, and if insights change > > y'all will hear from me :) > > > > Greetings, > > Martijn Schoemaker > > > > P.S.: Does anyone know a browser-like test tool which handles > > SSL and shows the actual data including headers ? I might > > even build one myself, since debugging these issues is > > now quite a pain in the *ss. I know there is an SSL ca- > > pable wget, but it's pretty irritating with cookies etc. > > > > "Foust, Adam G." wrote: > > > > > We are beginning a Apache 1.3.26 reverse-proxy setup with SiteMinder. I have > > > not seen the double Set-Cookie strangeness. We are using SiteMinder 4.61 > > > with the QMR4 apache webagent. I've observed some strange URL rewriting > > > issues involved with multi-domain sign-on and using cookie providers, but > > > nothing that can't be worked around. > > > > > > Our setup is basically apache reverse-proxies (mod_proxy) behind F5 > > > load-balancers. The reverse-proxies chain through intermediate firewalls > > > through another (forward) mod_proxy to backend DMZ servers. > > > > > > I have been tracing HTTP headers and have not yet seen the behavior you > > > describe. Are you running SiteMinder 5.0? > > > > > > > -- > > You have reached the end of the message. > > Press [t] to go to the top of this message, or [c] to close it. > > > > > > > > -- You have reached the end of the message. Press [t] to go to the top of this message, or [c] to close it.