Re: Siteminder/mod_proxy issues

Martijn Schoemaker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.mod-proxy
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Checked them and limits are set to 8Kb and looking at the header
sizes they don't exceed that.

I did some other testing however and I don't think we are going
to like this...

I put back an old libproxy.so from our (working) version shipped
with apache 1.3.12 into apach 1.3.26. And when I sniff the whole
kit'n kaboodle again I don't see the cookie duplication! If I put
back the version of 1.3.26, I DO see cookie duplication!

Does anybody know what might cause this ? I know siteminder depends
on a patch which inserts an : ap_overlay_tables() statement which
is already in the version of 1.3.26. Has something been changed in
relation to passing headers to other modules ? Might this statement
now causing headers to be added twice ?

Cheers,
Martijn Schoemaker

Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:

> Be aware that it *is* possible to get SM to produce a cookie sooooo big
> that it hits the 1024 (or wathever) single MIME line length limit of
> apache. See
>
>         LimitRequestLine (http_core.c)
>         LimitRequestFieldsize (http_core.c)
>
> and friends for more info.
>
> Dw.
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Martijn Schoemaker wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We use SM 4.51 and not yet the QMR4 web-agent. Will install
> > and try this out right away. In any case, this does not seem
> > to be a mod_proxy problem anyway. I did some more checking
> > and the browser problems are probably caused by the Set-Cookie
> > headers which are set multiple times. Also, the Cookies them-
> > selves for the user that works are smaller that the ones for
> > the user that don't work and this prolly gives strange effects
> > in IE (who whould have guessed ? :))
> >
> > Anyway, this seems more like a SM/Cookie/RFC issue and has no
> > further relation with mod_proxy.
> >
> > Thanks all who replied for the input, and if insights change
> > y'all will hear from me :)
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Martijn Schoemaker
> >
> > P.S.: Does anyone know a browser-like test tool which handles
> >       SSL and shows the actual data including headers ? I might
> >       even build one myself, since debugging these issues is
> >       now quite a pain in the *ss. I know there is an SSL ca-
> >       pable wget, but it's pretty irritating with cookies etc.
> >
> > "Foust, Adam G." wrote:
> >
> > > We are beginning a Apache 1.3.26 reverse-proxy setup with SiteMinder. I have
> > > not seen the double Set-Cookie strangeness. We are using SiteMinder 4.61
> > > with the QMR4 apache webagent. I've observed some strange URL rewriting
> > > issues involved with multi-domain sign-on and using cookie providers, but
> > > nothing that can't be worked around.
> > >
> > > Our setup is basically apache reverse-proxies (mod_proxy) behind F5
> > > load-balancers. The reverse-proxies chain through intermediate firewalls
> > > through another (forward) mod_proxy to backend DMZ servers.
> > >
> > > I have been tracing HTTP headers and have not yet seen the behavior you
> > > describe. Are you running SiteMinder 5.0?
> > >
> >
> > --
> > You have reached the end of the message.
> > Press [t] to go to the top of this message, or [c] to close it.
> >
> >
> >
> >

--
You have reached the end of the message.
Press [t] to go to the top of this message, or [c] to close it.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.