Re: ProxyAllow addition to mod_proxy

Ian Holsman <[email protected]> Thu, 29 Jan 2004 07:02:50 +1100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.mod-proxy
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Rob.
1. I see some benefit, and I would actually prefer to see a 
'proxyallow' in the default configuration

2. mail the output of  "cvs diff -u" to this mailing list with a 
subject line [PATCH] ...
    is the acceptable format for the change. If the change is a major 
one you might need to
    fill in a form saying it is yours.. (I'll double check on that)


On 29/01/2004, at 2:21 AM, Rob Reilly wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was looking through the mod_proxy threads and saw a request for the 
> following:
>
> ProxyAllow as opposite for ProxyBlock
>
> Due to a requirement for the same reason specified in the email 
> threads,
> preventing abuse of proxy, MasterCard required this same 
> functionality.  I made
> the changes to the mod_proxy source files to add the ProxyAllow 
> functionality
> (Apache-2.0.47).
>
> We have been using this new functionality for about a month in our Dev 
> and
> Staging Environment.  Production to go live 1/29/04.
>
> So my questions are:
>
> 1.  Do you see any benefit to adding this functionality to the Apache 
> source?
> 2.  How would I make such a submission of code back to the Apache 
> Group?
>      -All the documents I have read are for submitting bug fixes and 
> not
> enhancements to the source.  If you could point me in the right 
> direction to
> correctly initiate the enhancement submission process, I would greatly
> appreciate it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rob Reilly
>
>
>
>
>
--
Ian Holsman
Director
Network Management Systems
CNET Networks
PH: (61) 3-9857-3742 (Australia)/ 415-344-2608 (USA)