Re: proxy performance

Pavan Balaji wrote:

>No. I meant apache 2.0 was giving about 1.5 times better performance :-).
>Sorry about the confusion.
>
>  
>
Thanks.

Btw, can you expand on the following ?

"Anyways, the proxy forwarding is still giving terrible performance (as compared to running it just as a webserver) -- about 2-2.5 times worse."


-sumeet

> -- Pavan
>
>    =======================================================
>        Pavan Balaji,           |    774, Dreese Labs,
>        1584, Worthington St,   |    2015, Neil Avenue,
>        Columbus, OH43201       |    Columbus, OH43210
>        (614) 327 0973          |    (614) 292 8458
>    =======================================================
>
>"Being happy doesn't mean that everything's perfect... It just means that
>you have decided to see Beyond the Imperfections"  -- Rash
>
>On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Sumeet Singh wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Pavan Balaji wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>We had tried this sometime back, and apache 2.0 was giving about 1.5 times
>>>the performance. But I didn't do any fine tuning stuff, so am not sure how
>>>reliable these numbers are. Anyways, the proxy forwarding is still giving
>>>terrible performance (as compared to running it just as a webserver) --
>>>about 2-2.5 times worse.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Do you mean to say that when run as a proxy, apache 2.0 with worker-mpm
>>does worse than apache 1.3 ? That's surprising, because none of the
>>docs/articles that I have read have pointed out such a severe shortage
>>in performance (p.s. I am not saying that your results were wrong).
>>
>>-sumeet
>>
>>    
>>
>>>-- Pavan
>>>
>>>   =======================================================
>>>       Pavan Balaji,           |    774, Dreese Labs,
>>>       1584, Worthington St,   |    2015, Neil Avenue,
>>>       Columbus, OH43201       |    Columbus, OH43210
>>>       (614) 327 0973          |    (614) 292 8458
>>>   =======================================================
>>>
>>>"Being happy doesn't mean that everything's perfect... It just means that
>>>you have decided to see Beyond the Imperfections"  -- Rash
>>>
>>>On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Sumeet Singh wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Has anybody compared the performance apache 1.3.x running as a proxy
>>>>server (using mod_proxy) against apache 2.0 (using worker-mpm) ?
>>>>
>>>>-sumeet
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>
>  
>