Re: Varnish modsecurity binding
Christian Folini <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-security.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20190701172022.GA26609@leander> |
Hello Xavier, This sounds interesting. Do you have a link perhaps? Ahoj, Christian On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 07:15:18PM +0200, Xavier De Cock wrote: > Hello, > > As the use case became apparent in a company i work for, i've implemented a > small binding for the varnish proxy software. This should be considered a > proof of concept between alpha and beta quality. > > However to be able to stabilise the vmod, tests will prove useful. > > As with all project i recommend you yo test it on a staging env if > possible, review the code. > > Doc, test coverage & so on are still ongoing. But i'll be happy to take any > feedback and help make a contribution that will help other users. > > Currently most of it is ok, the body handling still need a more efficient > way of being done ( via varnish delivery (6.2) or fetch processor(6.1). But > i'm still searching for a way to access request privates variables. > > Thanks a lot for your attention and help. > > Regards, > > Xavier > _______________________________________________ > mod-security-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mod-security-users > Commercial ModSecurity Rules and Support from Trustwave's SpiderLabs: > http://www.modsecurity.org/projects/commercial/rules/ > http://www.modsecurity.org/projects/commercial/support/ _______________________________________________ mod-security-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mod-security-users Commercial ModSecurity Rules and Support from Trustwave's SpiderLabs: http://www.modsecurity.org/projects/commercial/rules/ http://www.modsecurity.org/projects/commercial/support/