Re: Retry-After header not being set?

Hi Jamie,

> Regarding the phasing, please can you tell me which numbers to use to make
> that work? All the examples I have found use the same phase numbers. If I
> set them the same, presumably the counter will never move?

You _could_ try moving your deprecatevar rule to phase 2 so that it's
executed before your deny rule, but that may well introduce unintended
side effects I haven't considered... (The point of having deprecatevar
execute in phase 5, as I understand it, is so that it takes place
unconditionally: putting it elsewhere could result in it being skipped
or removed or for something unforeseen to happen, breaking the whole
construct.)

You might have more luck decoupling the detection and blocking logic
by setting an "is_blocked" flag, checking for that, and then playing
with variable expiry times. You could even zero-out your
counting/detection variable on a successful block, so that it's back
to 0 again once a temporary block is over. There are some examples
like this in the ModSecurity Handbook, and I've seen a few tutorials
online doing similar things.

I'd still recommend steering clear of doing this in ModSecurity, though :)

Thanks,
Andrew

--

Andrew Howe
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
www.loadbalancer.org
+1 888 867 9504 / +44 (0)330 380 1064


_______________________________________________
mod-security-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mod-security-users
Commercial ModSecurity Rules and Support from Trustwave's SpiderLabs:
http://www.modsecurity.org/projects/commercial/rules/
http://www.modsecurity.org/projects/commercial/support/