Re: Data truncation problems
Joel Palmius <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:37:43 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-survey.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hehe, sorry.. I didn't really mean to speak geek. Given the version of firefox and OS I think we can say it is a server-side problem, which most likely makes it a problem with Mod_Survey. I just don't know where to begin to look right now. // Joel On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Jennifer Kurkoski wrote: > Hi folks, > > So, I have to admit that I'm not an engineer. Although I speak geek, we're > out of my league now. After discussing the issues w/ the engineer who set up > the server for me and installed the software, we're going to port to a > commercial service licensed during the time in which we set up mod_perl. The > aforementioned engineer is swamped w/ a couple other launches right now, but > I'll ping him in a week or so to get the system details. FWIW, I replicated > the problems using Firefox 1.0.7 on XP Pro. > > Thanks for all the help! I'll get those system details. > > - Jennifer > > On 3/24/06, Joel Palmius <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hrm. I'm not able to replicate the phenomenon. I've copied and pasted >> /etc/services (approx 30k text) into a memo and submitted, which works. >> Then I've copied and pasted it into 10 consecutive memos in one survey >> page, which also works. So with up around 300k data in one page submit, >> I've not had a problem. I've not tested with more data. >> >> Which leaves us with a system-specific problem. Can you post details about >> OS, perl version, mod_perl version, apache version, used browser and any >> other configuration details you think might be interesting? (For example, >> did you do any particular security settings in apache, such as limiting >> caches or similar) >> >> // Joel >> >> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Jennifer Kurkoski wrote: >> >>> Hi Joel & all, >>> >>> Thanks for the reply. Here are a few more details .... >>> >>> The text submission wasn't especially large: just over 2K characters >>> (including spaces). And MEMO never once accepted the whole text block. >>> >>> The total text accepted depended on the point in the survey at which I >>> pasted it in (that is, the question #). >>> >>> The MEMO questions occur near the end and then again at the very end of >> the >>> survey. The later in the survey that I pasted in text blocks, the less >> total >>> text accepted (Note: By "accepted" I mean the amount of text that was >>> present when I pulled the data. There's no error or other indication >> from >>> mod_survey that any problem as occurred). >>> >>> Also of note: once text was truncated in one MEMO question, no text >> appeared >>> at all in any subsequent MEMO questions. >>> >>> The whole survey contains ~26 questions, all on a single page. Some >>> questions are MATRIX (ranging from 2-15 rows), some LIST, some CHOICE, >> some >>> TEXT and some MEMO. >>> >>> I hope that helps. Looking forward to hearing quick and easy solutions. >> ;-) >>> >>> Thanks again, >>> >>> - Jennifer >>> (whose disseration research kinda' depends on this thing) >>> >>> >>> >>> On 3/21/06, Joel Palmius <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Never saw this happen with reasonably large posts inside MEMOs myself. >> You >>>> should easily get a few kilobytes of data inside a MEMO. But there are >>>> reasons why large posts could be truncated. >>>> >>>> There are limitations in the http protocol automatically truncating >> very >>>> long data submission when using plain forms. For a GET submit, only >>>> something like 1k data is allowed in a submit, for POST this is larger >>>> although unknown (it is not defined, it is dependent on both browser >> and >>>> server). We currently use POST with no special encoding. >>>> >>>> Further, the MEMO (in practise html's textarea) is limited in length. >> This >>>> limitation is also unknown. >>>> >>>> For very long chunks of data (in the size of hundreds of k) inside one >>>> submit, one would have to use a different form encoding, and probably >> file >>>> uploads. >>>> >>>> Could you post more details on the structure of the survey and how >> large >>>> the posted data was? >>>> >>>> // Joel >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Jennifer Kurkoski wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I'm having two problems I'm hoping someone here can solve. This is the >>>> first >>>>> (the second coming in a separate msg). >>>>> >>>>> I'm running mod_survey version 3.2.2. >>>>> >>>>> Data are being truncated when written to file. I have several MEMO >>>> blocks in >>>>> my survey. I tested the curious behavior by posting large chunks of >> text >>>> (~3 >>>>> long-ish paragraphs) into the MEMO blocks in different configurations >>>>> (skipping Q #1 & 4, for example). The result was always the same: The >>>> first >>>>> instance of the text block would be cut off at some point into it and >> no >>>>> other subsequent text blocks would apppear at all. Sadly, I discovered >>>> this >>>>> bug w/ a live survey. Blah. >>>>> >>>>> I tried searching the archives but found nothing. Anyone have any idea >>>>> what's going on? >>>>> >>>>> Many thanks!! >>>>> >>>>> - Jennifer >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> For best results, follow directions on bottle ... >>>>> and use my permanent address: >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>> Skickat av Joel Palmius <[email protected]> >>>> till survey-discussion >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> For best results, follow directions on bottle ... >>> and use my permanent address: >>> [email protected] >>> >> Skickat av Joel Palmius <[email protected]> >> till survey-discussion >> > > > > -- > For best results, follow directions on bottle ... > and use my permanent address: > [email protected] > Skickat av Joel Palmius <[email protected]> till survey-discussion