Re: Wackamole exits on RH9 and works fine on RH7.3

"Rama K. McIntosh" <[email protected]> Fri, 09 Jan 2004 16:03:15 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.mod-wackamole.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
FYI - I just restarted spread on both machines and the problem appears 
to have gone away. . .Perhaps I have a gost in my machines.

I will let you know if this crops up again and if I can figure out what 
sequence caused it before.

Thanks,
-Rama

Rama K. McIntosh wrote:

> Hello Wackamole Users,
>
> I am using Wackamole to maintain a virtual IP on 2 machines.   I am 
> using the latest CVS code as of today.
>
> Both machines use identical wackamole.conf configurations (below).    
> One machine is running RH7.3 while the other is running RH9.
>
> I have no problems with the RH7 box.    Howerver, if the RH9 box has 
> the virtual IP and I issue a wackatrl -f command __on the RH7 box__, 
> wackamole exits on the RH9 box with the following message in the log 
> file:
>
> Jan  9 12:10:03 jedi wackamole[23444]: DOWN: 
> eth0:1:10.10.10.25/255.255.255.255
>
> Note: I get the same behaviour if I kill the process on the RH7 box 
> (i.e.  RH9 has the IP, I kill the wackamole process on the RH7 box and 
> wackamole process exits on the RH9 box).
>
> If I run "wackamole -d" in the forground, the problem goes away and 
> everything works as expected.   If I reverse the machines (i.e. mess 
> with the RH9 box while the RH7 box has the IP) everything works fine.
>
> The only other thing that might be of interest, I see the folloing 
> error when wacamole starts up on both machines and connects to spread:
>
> Jan  9 12:09:47 jedi wackamole[23444]: 867 No such interface
>
> The RH9 box has 2.4.20-XXX kernal while the RH7 box has a 2.4.18-xxx 
> kernal.
>
> Here is my wackamole.conf (identical for both machines):
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>
>
> # The Spread daemon we are going to connect to.  It should be on the 
> local box
> Spread = 4803
> SpreadRetryInterval = 5s
> # The group name
> Group = wack1
> # Named socket for online control
> Control = /var/run/wack.it
>
> # Denote the interface we prefer to have
> #prefer eth0:10.3.4.5/8
> #prefer { eth0:10.2.3.4/8 eth1:192.168.10.23/24 }
>
> # In most cases, I just don't care.  Let wackamole decide.
> Prefer None
> #Prefer { eth0:10.10.10.25/32 }
>
>
> # List all the virtual interfaces (ALL of them)
> VirtualInterfaces {
>        # The following two lines have the same effect
>        # en0:192.168.1.2/24
>        { eth0:10.10.10.25/32 }
>        # This is how you say 2 or more IPs are to be treated as a single
>        # "set" or "virtual interface".  If wackamole decides that this
>        # machine will manage it, you are ensured to get ALL the ips in 
> the
>        # set.
>        # { en1:10.0.0.1/8 en0:192.168.35.64/26 }
> }
>
> # Collect and broadcast the IPs in our ARP table every so often
> Arp-Cache = 90s
>
> # List who we will notify
> #       Here the netblock (/24 or /28) can be deceptive.  It is NOT a 
> netmask
> #       for a single IP.  It is how one will describe that they want to
> #       notify ALL IPs in a segment.
> Notify {
>        # Let's notify our router:
>        eth0:10.10.10.1/32
>
>        # Notify out DB server
>        eth1:10.0.0.4/32
>        # 10.0.0.0 -> 10.0.0.255, but only 128 notifications/sec
>        eth0:10.10.10.0/24 throttle 128
>        # Wackamole shares arp-cache across machines, this says to
>        # notify every IP address in the aggregate shared arp-cache.
>        arp-cache
> }
> balance {
>        # This field is the maximum number of IP addresses that will move
>        # from one wackamole to another during a round of balancing.
>        AcquisitionsPerRound = all
>        # Time interval in each balancing round.
>        interval = 4s
> }
> # How long it takes us to mature
> mature = 5s
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>
> Thanks,
> -Rama
>
> _______________________________________________
> wackamole-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.backhand.org/mailman/listinfo/wackamole-users
>