RE: problem with wackamole
"Frazer, Andrew non Unisys" <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:10:01 +1300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.mod-wackamole.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <077B0972E8E7DB4D9D5C358B3443EF3905F69DC4@nzwlg-exch1.ap.uis.unisys.com> |
I think I understand what you are saying.. but.. I have one subnet ( 202.86.97.192/27 ), that has two apache servers ( real address's 202.86.97.202 and 202.86.97.203 ). The virtual address I want to use is 202.86.97.199.. Should I be using eth0:202.86.97.199/32 rather than 202.86.97.199/27 ? ) I have just read your paper " understanding and building HA/LB CLUSTERS " so, I've copied the config from example 3.5.1, but I see I used the /27 mask rather than the /32.. ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Theo Schlossnagle Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 3:56 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Theo Schlossnagle Subject: Re: [Wackamole-users] problem with wackamole VirtualInterfaces { { eth0:202.86.97.199/27 } } Looks a bit odd to me. Is that really the first IP address on that box in that netblock? If so, how are you adding in the default route for traffic to that IP? You can do this with wackamole using the extensions system, but that's pretty advanced. I recommend having the administrative IP address in the same network as the VirtualInterfaces to start with -- until you get the hang of how things work. // Theo Schlossnagle // Principal Engineer -- http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/ // OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. -- http://www.omniti.com/ // Ecelerity: fastest MTA on Earth