Re: Security Manager Interface

"Amila Suriarachchi" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.webservices.fx.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Jaliya Ekanayake <[email protected]>
wrote:

>  Hi Amila,
>
> I am not sure what we can achieve by only checking the security token
> header of the message.
> To verify the message is sent by the person who has the security token, the
> entire message should be verified for the signature.
>
yes. Actually these checks are depends on the policy.xml user has given. But
that verification is done by the Rampart handler.
What I thought was at RM level, it is enough to check  whether  the message
has used the security token used when creating the sequence.

Thanks,
Amila.

> To verify the message is not seen by anybody else, it can be encrypted.
>
> HTH,
> Jaliya
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Amila Suriarachchi <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Sunday, July 20, 2008 7:46 AM
> *Subject:* Security Manager Interface
>
> hi,
>
> Sandesha2 SecurityManager has this interface. Here what this message Part
> parameter means.
> /**
>      * Check that the given element of the message demonstrated proof of
> possession of
>      * the given token. This allows Sandesha to implement the checking
> required by the
>      * RM spec. Proof is normally demonstrated by signing or encrypting the
> the given
>      * part using the token.
>      * If the elements is not secured with the given token the
> SecurityManager must
>      * throw an exception.
>      */
>     public abstract void checkProofOfPossession(SecurityToken token,
> OMElement messagePart, MessageContext message)
>     throws SandeshaException;
>
> I went through the code and so that always Soap Body and Sequence header
> parts are passed to this parameter. Is this means
> for a Secure conversation is it required to Sign and Encrypt these parts?
> Is there any reason why this check is done like this without checking the
> given Security token value with the Security token value in the
> Security Header?
>
> thanks,
> Amila.
>
> --
> Amila Suriarachchi,
> WSO2 Inc.
>
>


-- 
Amila Suriarachchi,
WSO2 Inc.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.