Re: What's next for WS@Apache? Discuss.
Benson Margulies <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.webservices.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I am on vacation. expect a few remarks on xmlschema next week. On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Glen Daniels <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hm, mostly crickets chirping. > > Should we just Attic everything then? :) > > --G > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:08:17 -0400, Glen Daniels <[email protected] > > > wrote: >> Hey y'all, >> >> So as per my earlier mail to the dev lists, we need to talk about... >> >> * Which subprojects should be promoted to TLPs? >> * Which subprojects should be migrated to the Attic? >> * What should the structure look like for what remains? >> >> Here's what we've got to work with. >> >> 1. Axiom (commons) >> 2. Neethi (commons) >> 3. XmlSchema (commons) >> 4. Tcpmon (commons) >> 5. Guththila (commons) >> 6. JaxMe >> 7. jUDDI >> 8. Scout >> 9. Muse >> 10.Woden >> 11.WSIF >> 12.WSS4J >> 13.XMLRPC >> >> Let's talk Attic first. It seems WSIF and Muse have been pretty much >> inactive for some time now, so I'd propose we get the ball rolling >> with >> proposals to Attic both of those. JaxMe also seems ripe for the >> Attic. >> >> I think that it's pretty clear jUDDI and Scout should migrate >> together > to a >> new TLP, Apache jUDDI, with Kurt as chair. Thoughts? >> >> Does anyone outside of Axis2/C use Guththila? If not, I'd suggest >> that >> migrate to Axis. >> >> Is there enough activity on XMLRPC to keep it alive? Jochen? >> >> Personally, I'd probably prefer to leave Axiom, Neethi, XmlSchema, >> and >> Tcpmon >> as subprojects of WS. I'd like to get rid of the "commons" layer, > though, >> since I think the "new" WS project should itself be a set of commonly >> useful >> WS components. I know other ideas have been discussed for the >> commons >> stuff, >> so let's start that discussion and get the various opinions out on >> the >> table? >> >> That leaves Woden and WSS4J. Maybe Woden should stay in WS? As for > WSS4J, >> I'm not sure if it should stay or become a TLP. >> >> So... what do you guys think? >> >> Thanks, >> --Glen >> >> P.S. Reminder - please fill out your sections of our board report >> for > this >> month if appropriate!