Re: What's next for WS@Apache? Discuss.

I think that Axiom would be a good candidate for a TLP.

Andreas

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 05:08, Glen Daniels <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey y'all,
>
> So as per my earlier mail to the dev lists, we need to talk about...
>
> * Which subprojects should be promoted to TLPs?
> * Which subprojects should be migrated to the Attic?
> * What should the structure look like for what remains?
>
> Here's what we've got to work with.
>
> 1. Axiom (commons)
> 2. Neethi (commons)
> 3. XmlSchema (commons)
> 4. Tcpmon (commons)
> 5. Guththila (commons)
> 6. JaxMe
> 7. jUDDI
> 8. Scout
> 9. Muse
> 10.Woden
> 11.WSIF
> 12.WSS4J
> 13.XMLRPC
>
> Let's talk Attic first.  It seems WSIF and Muse have been pretty much
> inactive for some time now, so I'd propose we get the ball rolling with
> proposals to Attic both of those.  JaxMe also seems ripe for the Attic.
>
> I think that it's pretty clear jUDDI and Scout should migrate together to a
> new TLP, Apache jUDDI, with Kurt as chair.  Thoughts?
>
> Does anyone outside of Axis2/C use Guththila?  If not, I'd suggest that
> migrate to Axis.
>
> Is there enough activity on XMLRPC to keep it alive?  Jochen?
>
> Personally, I'd probably prefer to leave Axiom, Neethi, XmlSchema, and Tcpmon
> as subprojects of WS.  I'd like to get rid of the "commons" layer, though,
> since I think the "new" WS project should itself be a set of commonly useful
> WS components.  I know other ideas have been discussed for the commons stuff,
> so let's start that discussion and get the various opinions out on the table?
>
> That leaves Woden and WSS4J.  Maybe Woden should stay in WS?  As for WSS4J,
> I'm not sure if it should stay or become a TLP.
>
> So... what do you guys think?
>
> Thanks,
> --Glen
>
> P.S.  Reminder - please fill out your sections of our board report for this
> month if appropriate!
>