Re: What's next for WS@Apache? Discuss.

Glen Daniels <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.webservices.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Sanjiva,

Sorry for the late reply.

On 4/17/2010 3:37 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> Glen, your proposal amounts to having gone thru a lot of pain to have
> simply TLPed Axis. The entire board prerogative was to break up WS
> wasn't it? 

My interpretation was that it was more "WS is too big" than "WS should
entirely go away".  There are plenty of other projects at Apache that have a
reasonable number of subprojects, with related functions and development
communities.  I'm not yet convinced that there is sufficient community around
some of the individual subprojects to bootstrap a happy PMC, and there also
may be good reason to keep some of these things together.

I think reducing WS from >17 subprojects in a two-level container down to a
single-level container for 6 common Web Service related components would be a
pretty good accomplishment... and nothing prevents that from being an
intermediate step towards spinning off further TLPs down the road.

I'm not saying I'm -1 to more TLPs, by the way, just exploring my
off-the-cuff impressions.

--Glen

> I'd prefer to make a bunch of new TLPs - give people a chance to grow
> into new roles as well. All the ones you listed as "keep" should be TLPs
> IMO. There is no "minimum size" required to be a TLP.
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Glen Daniels <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     Hey y'all,
> 
>     So as per my earlier mail to the dev lists, we need to talk about...
> 
>     * Which subprojects should be promoted to TLPs?
>     * Which subprojects should be migrated to the Attic?
>     * What should the structure look like for what remains?
> 
>     Here's what we've got to work with.
> 
>     1. Axiom (commons)
>     2. Neethi (commons)
>     3. XmlSchema (commons)
>     4. Tcpmon (commons)
>     5. Guththila (commons)
>     6. JaxMe
>     7. jUDDI
>     8. Scout
>     9. Muse
>     10.Woden
>     11.WSIF
>     12.WSS4J
>     13.XMLRPC
> 
>     Let's talk Attic first.  It seems WSIF and Muse have been pretty much
>     inactive for some time now, so I'd propose we get the ball rolling with
>     proposals to Attic both of those.  JaxMe also seems ripe for the Attic.
> 
>     I think that it's pretty clear jUDDI and Scout should migrate
>     together to a
>     new TLP, Apache jUDDI, with Kurt as chair.  Thoughts?
> 
>     Does anyone outside of Axis2/C use Guththila?  If not, I'd suggest that
>     migrate to Axis.
> 
>     Is there enough activity on XMLRPC to keep it alive?  Jochen?
> 
>     Personally, I'd probably prefer to leave Axiom, Neethi, XmlSchema,
>     and Tcpmon
>     as subprojects of WS.  I'd like to get rid of the "commons" layer,
>     though,
>     since I think the "new" WS project should itself be a set of
>     commonly useful
>     WS components.  I know other ideas have been discussed for the
>     commons stuff,
>     so let's start that discussion and get the various opinions out on
>     the table?
> 
>     That leaves Woden and WSS4J.  Maybe Woden should stay in WS?  As for
>     WSS4J,
>     I'm not sure if it should stay or become a TLP.
> 
>     So... what do you guys think?
> 
>     Thanks,
>     --Glen
> 
>     P.S.  Reminder - please fill out your sections of our board report
>     for this
>     month if appropriate!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
> Founder, Director & Chief Scientist; Lanka Software Foundation;
> http://www.opensource.lk/
> Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
> Director; Sahana Software Foundation; http://www.sahanafoundation.org/
> Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
> 
> Blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.