Re: Proposal to Revive Apache Livy Community
larry mccay <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Oct 2022 14:40:01 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.clustering.spark.livy.devel,gmane.comp.apache.webservices.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACRbFyjp7frwXN4UDT_3dhy8z=c-Vz_ERR3oA3RL8hhjFZSpPw__13306.5141666279$1665772898$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
--000000000000c7f17705eb02f448 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [email protected] <[email protected]> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 2:38 PM larry mccay <[email protected]> wrote: > Abstract > > Livy is a web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long > running Apache Spark contexts in your cluster. With Livy, new application= s > can be built on top of Apache Spark that require fine grained interaction > with many Spark contexts [1]. > > While this project has been well regarded and used in many contexts as th= e > defacto standard API to Spark environments, it has been incubating for ov= er > 5 years without graduation to a TLP and it has become difficult to > impossible for fixes and improvements to be contributed as the current > community seems to have moved on. > > There has been discussion regarding retirement of this podling where ther= e > seems to be some increasing interest in joining and reviving the communit= y > [2]. > > The intent of this proposal is to avoid retiring a well regarded, activel= y > used and rather mature project by reviving the PPMC and community with ne= w > folks that have a vested interest in the project and health of the > community. > Proposal > > We propose to revive the PPMC with a set of contributors and maintainers > as mentors, PPMC members and committers. > > The retirement DISCUSS thread [2] has shown a growing interest in > providing new committers and bringing improvements and fixes from > organization=E2=80=99s internally maintained forks back to a revived comm= unity. > > General Approach to Revival: > > - > > Add new Mentors > - > > Larry McCay, [email protected] , Cloudera > - > > Sunil Govindan, [email protected], Cloudera > - > > Imran Rashid - [email protected], Cloudera > > > > - > > Add new Committers/PPMC > - > > Larry McCay, [email protected], Cloudera > - > > Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli, [email protected], Cloudera > - > > Gyorgy Gal, ggal ,[email protected], Cloudera > - > > Wing Yew Poon, [email protected], Cloudera > - > > Xilang Yan, [email protected], Shopee > - > > Jianzhen Wu, [email protected], Shopee > - > > Nagella Jagadeewara Rao, [email protected], Visa > - > > Pralab Kumar, [email protected], Visa > - > > Prasad Shrikant, [email protected], Visa > - > > Brahma Reddy Battula, [email protected], Visa > > > > - > > Invite existing PPMC members to opt-in or otherwise go emeritus > - > > Jean-Baptiste Onofr=C3=A9, [email protected], Talend (opted-in vi= a > Retirement DISCUSS thread [2]) > > > > - > > Invite existing Committers/PPMC members to opt-in or otherwise go > emeritus > > > > - > > Establish Roadmap via follow up DISCUSS thread > - > > Known Improvements from Forks which will need proposals and > discussion: > - > > Adding HA for Livy > - > > Updating security capabilities (eg. kerberos for jdbc, fixing > bugs in encryption) > - > > Expanding the support for kubernetes > - > > Responding to CVEs in dependencies (eg. log4j, thrift) > - > > Livy rest cluster - IS THIS SAME AS HA for Livy ABOVE? > - > > Support multi Spark versions > - > > Implemented a metrics system for Livy > - > > Support customize batch/interactive session lifecycle event > handler, default log event with log4j, very helpful for trouble = shooting > - > > Optimize log to track which session id the log message came > from, also very helpful for trouble shooting > - > > Support customize Spark config optimization rules, can be used > to optimize config for users=E2=80=99 job > - > > A set of command line tool which can be used to replace Spark=E2= =80=99s > spark-submit, pyspark, spark-sql but actually submit application= in Livy > - > > We are planning to implement a JDBC state store, and allow multi > Livy Thrift sessions to share one backend Spark application in t= he next few > months. > - > > These items and others that are brought to community may need > consolidation or multiple configurable options and will need to be = part of > the discussion > - > > One-pager Livy Improvement Proposals (LIP) may make sense to > drive these discussions and convergence > - > > Feature Branch Strategy for large changes > - > > Large features are hard to review we will need to define a > strategy > - > > Determine the Improvements to be delivered across first 3 Releases > with Target Release Dates > > > > - > > Ensure CVE and Dependency management hygiene is in place > > > The above approach will usher the community back to an active status with > a Roadmap of 3 or more release plans and security hygiene in place. > Development Practices > > The Livy project follows a review before commit philosophy. Every commit > automatically runs through the unit tests and generates coverage reports > presented as a pull request comment. Our experience with this process lea= ds > us to believe that it helps ease new contributors into the project. They > get feedback quickly on common mistakes, lowering the burden on reviewers= . > Those same reviewers get to lead by example, showing the new contributors > that we value feedback within our community even when changes are done by > more experienced folks. Taken from the original Apache Livy Proposal [1], > this should continue to be true. As mentioned, Livy is a mature project a= nd > as such RTC is the most appropriate for continued quality and awareness. > > > > 1. > > Original Apache Livy Proposal > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/incubator/LivyProposal > 2. > > Retirement DISCUSS thread > https://lists.apache.org/thread/gcstsrhbp91c5mm55htqn1l3djv8m7o0 > > --000000000000c7f17705eb02f448--