Re: Invocation by directly providing XML message

Jos van den Oever wrote:

>Hi Alek,
>
>Thanks for your extensive reply.
>
>  
>
>>i only support WSDL doc/literal and no rpc/encoding.
>>    
>>
>Oops, I definitly need rpc.
>
>Well, I guess I'll have to roll my own. :-(
>  
>
rpc/literal is supported to some degree in XSUL2 but support is limited 
(and untestd)

>But I've got a simple client running now. It's now difficult after all.
>  
>
i agree that generic functionality is easy but devil is in details in 
particular making API easier actually is hard part and then there is 
supporting SOAP 1.1 and 1.2, different binding styles in WSDL, async 
messaging (WS-Addressing, correlations) and so on.

>Thanks again for your trouble, though!
>  
>
best,

alek


-- 
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay