[jira] Commented: (WSIF-74) Multiple soap:header and soap:headerfault elements not accepted by WSIFOperation_ApacheAxis.

    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSIF-74?page=comments#action_12319733 ] 

Aleksander Slominski commented on WSIF-74:
------------------------------------------

hi Rhett,

as WSIF may be migrated from CVS to SVN (as part of general ws.apache.org migration) your patch may take some time to be applied.

> Multiple soap:header and soap:headerfault elements not accepted by WSIFOperation_ApacheAxis.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: WSIF-74
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSIF-74
>      Project: Axis-WSIF
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: Basic Architecture
>     Versions: 2.0
>     Reporter: Rhett DeWall
>  Attachments: WSIFOperation_ApacheAxis.java, WSIFOperation_ApacheAxis_v2.java
>
> WSDL 1.1 states that multiple soap:header and soap:headerfault elements are valid; however, WSIFOperation_ApacheAxis.java only allows one per operation.  WSDL 1.1 excerpt listed below:
> ------------------------
> <definitions .... >
>     <binding .... >
>         <operation .... >
>            <input>
>              <soap:header message="qname" part="nmtoken" use="literal|encoded"
>                           encodingStyle="uri-list"? namespace="uri"?>*
>                <soap:headerfault message="qname" part="nmtoken" use="literal|encoded"
>                                  encodingStyle="uri-list"? namespace="uri"?/>*
>              <soap:header>                                
>            </input>
>            <output>
>                <soap:header message="qname" part="nmtoken" use="literal|encoded"
>                             encodingStyle="uri-list"? namespace="uri"?>*
>                  <soap:headerfault message="qname" part="nmtoken" use="literal|encoded"
>                                    encodingStyle="uri-list"? namespace="uri"?/>*
>                <soap:header>                                
>            </output>
>         </operation>
>     </binding>
> </definitions>
> ------------------------
> A fix is attached whereby lines 473 and 496 have been changed to call getExtElems() versus getExtElem.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira