Re: [xgws-user] WSIF or ESB ?

I agree that ESB and WSIF are not the same but one could easily ask 
himself : Do I need a full scale solution like ESB or do I need only a 
client-side connecting facility ?

WSIF gives the opportunity to use a service repository (your code) 
without compromising your calling code (your client).
ESB offers this feature over SOAP (almost all of them) and allow you to 
deploy whatever service you want behind the ESB access. And to do a lot 
more ! security, transformation, monitoring, etc.

So one should ask himself do I ONLY need to make my client "service 
implementation independent" ? if the answer is definitely yes then WSIF 
is eligible.
If you have doubts or if you know you must go farther, go look for a 
nice ESB and be prepare to set up a full grade server solution

best,
Cyril


Aleksander Slominski a écrit :
> Andre P. wrote:
>   
>> Hello everyone.
>>  
>> Will ESB (or have it already) embody the WSIF functionalities?
>>  
>> Why should I use WSIF instead of an ESB (or vice-versa)?
>>     
> i think it completely depend on use case and comparing ESB and WSIF is a
> bit like oranges and apples - WSIF is just a client side library - ESBs
> typically imply whole system - that is my .01c
>
> best,
>
> alek
>
>   

-- 
*Cyril Rognon*
Responsable Capitalisation
+33 1 55 93 36 87
+33 6 08 89 16 86
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 	
268, avenue du Président Wilson 93210 LA PLAINE-SAINT-DENIS
Std : +33 1 55 93 26 00 - Fax : +33 1 55 93 26 01
*"SQLI Consulting, l'expert du conseil IT"*
www.sqli.com <http://www.sqli.com>

/----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes (ci-après le "message") sont 
confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires.
Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message 
électronique est susceptible d'altération.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

/