Re: [WSIF] Dynamic Invocation Evaluation Question

Christian Kloner <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:17:07 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.apache.webservices.wsif.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
hi,

why do you think, that Axis2 Java has no support for dynamic invocation? 
The thing is, if you use the RawXmlMessage Handler for sending and 
receiving messages, you can construct with Axiom any SOAP message and 
send it through the net to any destination. I also used it in my 
workflow project and created an own invocation API around it. if you are 
interested in it, i can manage to give you access to it.

WSIF was a fine project, but i think it is a bit outdated. I used it in 
my invocation api 2 years ago but the problem was, that i had to invoke 
web services really dynamically without having any java object to 
deserialize xml to. as i know, for every xml message, you need to 
register a java object to deserialize to. but what is, if you don't have 
any java class compiled for the receiving xml message... please tell me, 
if I am not correct and WSIF now supports a really dynamic approach for 
complex datatype handling. thanks.

chris


Clifford Audinet wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have a project that has several requirements related to dynamic
> invocation of web services using SOAP and async messaging using JMS.
> Our product is written in C and so initially I thought that using the
> new Axis2/C implementation might be the way to go as it supports client
> side dynamic invocation of web services.
> 
> However, there are some clear benefits in implementing the web
> services client in Java.  This led me to look at the Axis2 Java
> implementation which doesn't have support for dynamic invocation.  That
> lead me to the WSIF project which appears to meet my requirements.  So a
> couple of questions:
> 
> 1) It looks like the last release was 2003 and that there was a release
> planned for 2006.  Is that release still planned?
> 2) As I will be going through the samples over the next couple of days
> is it advisable to pull the source for bug fixes, etc that occurred post
> 2003 release?
> 
> Thank you for your time,
> 
> Cliff
>