What is the current status of WSIF
Ahmet Emre <aemre-jUshP35U9edWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:40:24 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.apache.webservices.wsif.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=_alternative 0050BCA6872572F8_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" We are starting to use some web services first time in our company. There were few web service calls we had developed in the past and we were using WSIF. Now we do expect more and more web service calls being made and we do expect web services becoming an important part of the architecture in a year or so. How do you guys see WSIF in the future? In order to invoke Web Services do you believe WSIF is the way to go? Or would you say WSIF is legacy and focus on something else? As I researched little bit, WSIF community is not very active anymore. There are many other things going on and it looks like Service Component Artchitecture (SCA) and some Eclipse Web Tools Platform (WTP) are the ones to consider first. Thanks for sharing your experience and thoughts on this subject. --=_alternative 0050BCA6872572F8_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">We are starting to use some web services first time in our company. There were few web service calls we had developed in the past and we were using WSIF. Now we do expect more and more web service calls being made and we do expect web services becoming an important part of the architecture in a year or so.</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">How do you guys see WSIF in the future? In order to invoke Web Services do you believe WSIF is the way to go? Or would you say WSIF is legacy and focus on something else? As I researched little bit, WSIF community is not very active anymore. There are many other things going on and it looks like Service Component Artchitecture (SCA) and some Eclipse Web Tools Platform (WTP) are the ones to consider first.</font> <br> <br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks for sharing your experience and thoughts on this subject.</font> --=_alternative 0050BCA6872572F8_=--