Re: how auth "local" works and is documented

On 08/16/2017 09:38 AM, Chapman Flack wrote:

> but still tried the 0 first to stay as general as possible for
> systems without that problem. But I don't feel strongly about it.
> 
> ... if SOCK_STREAM support is needed
> in every case, then I suppose no generality would be lost by
> requiring it in this test. If you prefer that, the patch would
> simply be the version in the first commit, but with 0 replaced by
> SOCK_STREAM.

Did you want me to make any change in the pull request?

-Chap