Re: amflush surprize auth=ssh.
Jon LaBadie <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.archivers.amanda.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <YSR/[email protected]> |
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 06:30:24PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: >Hi, > >What you describe is what I see when I do not use chunks. The last >backup to the last vtape will be transfered again to vtape on next >amdump or amflush. > >Kind regards >Jose M Calhariz Yes, that is the historically desired behavior when DLE dumps could not be split across physical or virtual tapes. The last DLE dumped when the tape "ran out" must be retaped in its entirety. But with chunks, no more than the last chunk should need to be retaped. Amanda has record of which chunks were successfully taped. Jon > >On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 02:40:52PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: >> I have one large DLE that gets broken into about >> 45 chunks for taping. My vtapes hold 20 of these >> chunks and I allow up to 3 tapes to be used nightly. >> >> Two evening back another large DLE was in the same >> dump so only about 30 of the 45 chunks fit on the >> three tapes. >> >> Today I ran amflush thinking amanda would just tape >> the 15 untaped chunks onto 1 vtape. But no, it is doing >> the entire 45 which will take 3 vtapes. >> >> In a vtape environment, is this reasonable behavior? >> >> Was there a way to flush only the untaped chunks? >> >> Jon >> > >>> End of included message <<< -- Jon H. LaBadie [email protected] 11226 South Shore Rd. (703) 787-0688 (H) Reston, VA 20190 (703) 935-6720 (C)