LVM for vtapes

Jon LaBadie <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.archivers.amanda.user
Message-ID <YUkL/CqQRi8/[email protected]>
Interesting discussion in other threads got me wondering
whether I should have made some other choices when setting
up my vtape environment.  Particularly whether I should
have used LVM (Logical Volume Management) to create one
large filesystem covering my multiple dedicated disks.

Its a topic I do not recall being discussed, pros & cons.

Let me describe my current vtape environment as a starting
point.  I have 6 hard drives dedicated to vtapes, 3x3TB
and 3x4TB, 21TB total.  I have 240 vtapes of 100GB (0.1TB)
allocated.  That works out to 11-12 vtapes/TB.

When I first set things up, I did not like the idea of
one drive having all consecutive vtapes meaning it would
exclusively be used for about a month and not used again
for about 4 months.

Instead I allocated blocks of 8-12 vtapes on one drive
and the next block on the next drive ...  In part I felt
on drive failure, it would minimize my loss exposure of
recent backups to about a week rather than a month.

I wonder whether I might have instead just pooled the
six drives into one logical volume and not worry about
specific allocation ov vtapes to specific drives.

Hmmm, 21TB filesystem, hell of a beast to fsck ;)

Has anyone used LVM for their vtapes?  Positive or
negative results to report?

Jon

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                 [email protected]
  11226 South Shore Rd.          (703) 787-0688 (H)
  Reston, VA  20190              (703) 935-6720 (C)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.