Re: defaukt contents of /etc/amanda
Diego Zuccato <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Aug 2025 14:14:25 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.archivers.amanda.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
That should be it: 'x' on a directory means you can enter it (even if you can't read its contents... useful for 'blind-drop folders: create a bunch of randomly-named dirs inside a 0711 one and give users only the path to where they can have access). Diego Il 19/08/25 01:27, Winston Sorfleet ha scritto: > As horrible as it only sounds, I'd try a strace. Also... I don't think > it should make a difference, but try adding +x to your permissions, > since it's a directory...(?) > > On 2025-08-18 18:28, gene heskett wrote: >> On 8/17/25 14:32, gene heskett wrote: >>> preferably in ls -lR format >>> my /etc/amanda after an install of the deb's is empty, on a bannana- >>> pi-m5 running bookworm. >>> >>> Thanks all. >>> >>> Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET. >> No reply's. Amazing since the wiki page claims its the most popular >> backup ever.. So I've played the 10,000 monkeys trying to rewrite >> Shakespears output, probably followed the ownership and perms too >> well. Tried to invent the user backup, succeeded well enough I can >> login as first user (gene) then sudo -i to become root. then "su >> backup", who can the df a 10T raid6 and see: >> backup@amanda:/root$ df /raid6 >> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used >> Available Use% Mounted on >> /dev/mapper/vg0-myraid 11272913680 1055764 11271857916 1% /raid6 >> owned by backup:backup, with perms=040660, or rw,rw,--. looks good >> right? BUT: >> ==================== >> root@amanda:~# su backup >> backup@amanda:/root$ ls -l /raid6 >> ls: cannot access '/raid6/DailySet1': Permission denied >> total 0 >> d????????? ? ? ? ? ? DailySet1 >> backup@amanda:/root$ ls -l /raid6/DailySet1 >> ls: cannot access '/raid6/DailySet1': Permission denied >> ==================== >> So something is still fubar. The question is what? >> Thank you for any assistance. >> >> Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET.