Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)

Les Mikesell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.archivers.star.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 08:17, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >
> > time star -c -no-fifo  /tmp>/dev/null
> > real    0m30.325s
> > user    0m0.261s
> > sys     0m4.396s
> >
> > gun tar test
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > wyatt:/# time tar -c  /tmp>/dev/null
> > real    0m1.054s
> > user    0m0.212s
> > sys     0m0.110s
> 
> If you like to do a _real_ _test_ why do you compare the star time 
> against a dummy command?
> 

In case this isn't clear, gnutar notices when it's output is
connected to /dev/null and doesn't actually bother reading
the files in that case.  This is a special case to make
--times work quickly for estimates like amanada uses to
decide whether to do a full or incremental run.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.