Re: VOLHDR or something
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Dec 2005 07:47:05 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.archivers.star.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <006101c60468$3d38a470$fd01a8c0@zoran> |
Joerg Schilling wrote: > "Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Joerg Schilling wrote: >>> "Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> star -c f=/dev/st0 VOLHDR=Test . >>>> >>>> How can I read VOLHDR from tape? >>>> I don't want to extract nothing but a VOLHDR. >>> >>> This script "finds" the file mark position on tape asuming that >>> the volhdr is follows a "hostname:directory" rule: >> >> I used your script as base for my. On suse 9.3 or 10.0 there is man >> match page, but there is not match command?!? >> Therefore I must use grep and other tricks to achive same result. >> >> TAPE="/tmp/kaseta.star" >> >> dd if=$TAPE bs=500b count=1 of=/tmp/sdd.$$ 2> /dev/null >> Zaglavlje=`star -tv f=/tmp/sdd.6808 2> /dev/null | grep "Volume >> Header" | awk '{print $9}'` > > Why do you use a completely unsuitable blocksize although my script > was OK? Based on my empirical experience I find out that using block size 500x512 and FIFO 8m gives the best results on my suse 9.3 prof. server. I wrote about that before, but you never answered. Portability is not important because I menage only one linux server. Zoran